- Top Features:
- War Room
- Glenn Greenwald
- Broadsheet
- Joan Walsh
- Camille Paglia
- Since You Asked
- Follow Salon:
Read other letters about this article
There's this school of thought (in music production) about using drum machines that believes the absolute worst thing someone can do with them is try to make them sound like/be a replacement for a real drummer. Even when using samples of real drums, no matter how many variables (subtle or otherwise - pressure sensitivity, swing rhythm, playable pads, for example) there are, it will technically never sound like a human being for the simple fact that it isn't. Kind of in the same way, the only way to get a drummer to sound just like John Bonham is to dig him up and reanimate him long enough for a session.
In short, the idea is that (supposedly), anyone who strives to make a drum machine sound like a real drummer is a fool. That it will sound more natural if one keeps in mind that it most definitely is not.
Point being, why does a robot receptionist (or even sex toy) have to be made to look like as much like a living, breathing woman as possible? I don't mean it needs to look like R2D2, but if people really have to have one of those things, what's wrong with a big, funny, comfy pillow with whatever goddawfulness (a synthetic vagina?) they need to attach to sell it to people who would buy one.
I know the answer is the same as why SUVs need to have 8 cyliners instead of 4, but look how that's turned out.
