This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Tuesday, June 30, 2009 12:00 AM

The baby's a...we're not telling!

Parents of 2-year-old refuse to reveal child's gender

Read other letters about this article

  • Tuesday, June 30, 2009 12:45 PM

    "poor child will be years behind..."

    years behind at WHAT, exactly? at performing gender-stereotyped activities? i mean, presumably this child is learning how to walk, talk, run, play; learning its preferences (likes soccer, painting, watermelon, doesn't like peanut butter, swings, scary movies), developing into a little person. What kinds of *really* important things are being missed if the child doesn't have society's expectations for gender behavior imposed on it? So when it realizes it's a girl, it's bad that the child is "behind" at simpering, flirting, preferring pink and disdaining sweaty activities? lots of parents would see that as a plus.

    i just don't see what "catching up" this child would have to do.

Most Active Letters Threads

363

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
190

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
94

How dare you criticize wasteful defense spending!

So you think it's only terrorist-appeasing lefties who are down on Pentagon profligacy? Think again
47

Have yourself a very merry black Friday

The author of "Scroogenomics" explains why holiday shopping is a drain on the wallet and the holiday spirit
46

Police to talk to Woods

Early morning crash raises questions, and revives tabloid speculation

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon