Letters posted here are associated with the following article:

72
Letters
Tuesday, February 10, 2009 12:00 AM

Salma Hayek breast-feeds an African baby

The actress encounters a starving infant in Sierra Leone and pops out a breast, on camera.

The letters thread is now closed.

View:
Tuesday, February 10, 2009 12:32 PM

Huh, you mean mammary glands are for feeding babies?

Congratulations, world, you have finally grown up.

Tuesday, February 10, 2009 12:38 PM

Thank you Selma

THAT was the appropriate, ethical, moral response. Take immediate action to help the starving person. This is unlike a "journalist" who would simply stand there, point a camera at the starving infant, take some notes, shake his/her head, and move on to the next shot. Mustn't "sully" themselves by offering immediate aid.

I mean this literally. This is what "journalists" are about. No ethics, no morals, nothing but themselves.

I love you, Selma, for your simple, decent act.

Tuesday, February 10, 2009 12:40 PM

Yeah, it was nice

I wonder what she did for the starving adults, though.

Tuesday, February 10, 2009 12:41 PM

Now I get it

First, what a nice thing for Ms. Hayak to do. Kudos.

Second, now I understand my frustration with Broadsheet. The only stories about women deemed worthy of attention are those that involve pop cultural references or celebrities. That explains why issues relevant to a broad swath of women are generally ignored.

Tuesday, February 10, 2009 12:45 PM

Absolutely gratuitous

Ridiculous. Ms Hayek clearly feels the need to be in the limelight. How about this: she could have bought the family goods and food and not been so utterly demonstrative in such a clearly egotistical way. Any humanitarian mission is equipped with available baby food, and Ms Hayek is welcome to increase that amount with her ample money rather than increasing her public noteriety with her own ample breast milk. All the more appalling is that she should know full well that the mother of the child couldn't say no. This is the height of the imperial arrogance.

Tuesday, February 10, 2009 12:50 PM

If I had a full boob

of course I would. Women feeding other women's children used to be nothing out of the ordinary.

Of course, if I had Salma Hayek's money, there are more efficient ways to get people fed.

Tuesday, February 10, 2009 12:53 PM

Gams on Glass

Ms Hayek is welcome to increase that amount with her ample money

For all you know, she already has donated millions.

This way she does something that people will react to more strongly and emphasizes her belief that breast milk is better for infants than bottle milk. In addition, she takes a shot at racism by unhesitatingly feeding a baby that looks very different from her.

This act achieves many things simply contributing money behind the scenes cannot do. And she was there in the first place to use her celebrity to call attention to the plight of those less fortunate. It wasn't egotistical, it was bringing all the power she has to bear on a problem she is concerned about.

Tuesday, February 10, 2009 01:09 PM

One week old babies need breastmilk, not baby food

Quote: Any humanitarian mission is equipped with available baby food, and Ms Hayek is welcome to increase that amount with her ample money

The baby was only one week old. What did you want her to do? Feed the baby pureed peaches? Breastmilk was by far the best thing for that baby.

And yes, breastmilk is far better for a newborn than formula.

I am so impressed with Salma Hayek!

Tuesday, February 10, 2009 01:11 PM

Salma

This shows again what a real person she is; she hasn't forgotten the solidarity of the society of her Mexican childhood. It's clear in her acting.

Tuesday, February 10, 2009 01:11 PM

Her breasts prob filled with milk

when she saw the baby or heard it cry. Mine would have. It was an instinctive, generous, loving gesture.

Tuesday, February 10, 2009 01:17 PM

hero or jerk?

I put up this poll: (linkback) Hero or Jerk? Salma Hayek breast-feeds an African baby [VOTE] - http://www.thriveorfail.com/b7315

Tuesday, February 10, 2009 01:17 PM

@Lynx

Hear, hear. Well said.

I was never a big Princess Di worshipper, but this story reminded me of the time she deliberately took off her gloves before shaking the hand of a patient with AIDS. Of course it was a symbolic gesture, but an important, worthwhile one nevertheless.

I was moved by the video. I applaud both Ms. Hayek's act and her sharing the story of her great-grandmother before her, who was not a celebrity yet did the same thing when the opportunity to do so presented itself.

What's with the prevalence of nasty-gram cynicism about every damned thing, no matter how positive, these days? Sheesh! Let's celebrate humane acts wherever they occur, and whoever does them!

--werrit

Tuesday, February 10, 2009 01:17 PM

Grapes of Wrath Connection

Not to create flashbacks of high school English class, but this seems very reminiscent of the end of John Steinbeck's Grapes of Wrath. In that scene the recent mother breast feeds a dying man.

Tuesday, February 10, 2009 01:28 PM

@Gams on Glass

And I thought I was cynical. I'm willing to bet that the mother of the baby didn't mind having someone feed her baby. I'm also willing to bet that the mother was provided formula to continue feeding her baby after Hayek left - hopefully enough that she didn't have to dilute it to make it last a bit longer (a big problem with formula feeding in 3rd world nations). I'm not a "breast is the only option" person - imo, any kind of nutritious food that will sustain a baby should be fed to the baby, regardless of whether it comes from a body or a bottle. But Hayek made an important point here, one that needed to be made - when her healthy, westen body fed a baby whose mother was not able to feed him.

Tuesday, February 10, 2009 01:31 PM

My cynical heart is warmed

A sensible and thoughtful celebrity? Someone who does the obvious correct thing despite the endless ankle-biters all around? I am impressed.

Tuesday, February 10, 2009 01:40 PM

I would do the same

I would probably never encounter the same situation but Selma acted with proper moral instinct.

This is reminiscent of the Chinese police officer who impulsively breastfed eleven babies whose mothers were injured or killed following the earthquake and collapse of a hospital building in China last year.

Tuesday, February 10, 2009 01:41 PM

While it's a nice gesture...

...the cynic in me can't help but be aware of how much attention a Broadsheet story containing "Salma Hayek" and "breasts" will draw.

It certainly got my attention.

Tuesday, February 10, 2009 01:46 PM

Another link.

The one in the post didn't work for me. Here's another.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kM7kKJ1NbQA

Seems pretty harmless overall.

Tuesday, February 10, 2009 01:50 PM

Salma Hayek

What a good woman she is.

Tuesday, February 10, 2009 02:01 PM

Why is this news?

That is all.

Tuesday, February 10, 2009 02:21 PM

The worst thing about this culture

...is that a one woman breast feeding another woman's baby would be considered news. Thanks for outgrowing some really dumb cultural conditioning, Selma.

Tuesday, February 10, 2009 02:24 PM

Surely there's a Jack Donaghy joke in here somewhere

Too bad I just can't think of one right now...

Oh well.

Thanks, Salma, for being who you are.

Tuesday, February 10, 2009 02:26 PM

go easy, her first language isn't English

She usually works with a script. Maybe she's nervous speaking extemporaneously in front of a camera, like most of us, and especially in a foreign language.

As for the breastfeeding: The whole point of the trip is to draw attention to what's going on in Sierra Leone, so even the greatest cynic has to agree that she's succeeding beyond anyone's wildest dreams. And the baby got a full tummy of milk, so it's a win all around.

Most Active Letters Threads

426

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
423

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
210

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
111

How dare you criticize wasteful defense spending!

So you think it's only terrorist-appeasing lefties who are down on Pentagon profligacy? Think again
61

Police to talk to Woods

Early morning crash raises questions, and revives tabloid speculation

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon