Site Presented By
Sunday, Nov 8, 2009
That was GORGEOUS.
If this is true then why do ugly women, (or average women) turn down propositions from ugly men (or average men)far far FAR more often than the other way around. If two people claim to be starving but one refuses to eat an egg because it isn't cooked enough and is too runny can they both REALLY be equally hungry? I suppose you could try and stretch a point and answer "YES" if you were dealing in one case with a life threatening allergy.
At the very least we should admit that lots of women who attack men for being insufficiently deferential to women in the exact same manner that Laurel is doing actually agree with me on this point, like Smith. It's funny that when there are too possible positions on an issue people on BOTH sides attack, and consider themselves on the same side. It just demonstrates that it's really all about power and deference and not about the issue under discussion at all.
Would you criticise a woman for anonymously complaining about having to clean up after a drunk incontinent man? FWI since you are so concerned about her she has no idea I am doing this, but really do you not see what an INCRDIBLE assertion of privilige your statement implies?
if she wanted to she easily could have (admittedly this was a problem before the advent of viagra, but it no longer is).
Leona Helmsley was so crabby even her dildo wilted away.
money will EVER buy him the gorgeous supermodel of his dreams?
Please. Some woman challenged me to my size. If I am a loser in the love game, it is only because of how this society teaches boys to be passive wimps. I got over that. I figured out where my thinking was wrong. I can date all I want now.
I have described how I have no faith in American women. I have described the reasons for my feelings. ALAS, I am stuck in the states now yet again, having been unable to sell my house, moving back to Austin to take a lucrative gig, and figuring I may as well continue to live in the house rather than giving it back to the bank, as now I can support the payments.
As for being crazy or whatever? I rent to and know lots of guys and girls. The men almost invariably are more insane and whacked out than I can ever imagine being. The women are almost invariably big time skanks.
Some of the craziest motherfuckers are wealthy and have incredible women on their arms with others waiting in the wings.
No amount of feminist shaming in this regard can warp REALITY, to your detriment.
Brighty, take a hint. You are staring down another 43 years (approx.) of bitter loneliness, no children, and it won't ever get better until you get sane. And it's not because "women are feminazis". It's because you are nuts.
Every person who thinks things through for themselves is considered nuts by those who just ape the lines they read somewhere.
I do not expect ANY intellectuals among the feminists. Most of them just repeat the lines as if from some prayer book, hoping the boogie men will go away.
I am as lonely as I want to be. If I DO feel lonely it is because most of the women I have dated seem to lack any real spark of life to them (and frankly, most of the men I befriend). They mostly slug along thru life, being passive consumers, playing professional victim. It could drive any guy mad.
And BTW, if "wimmin" were not the target of your hatred and vile, it would be the Blacks or the Jews or the Liberrrrals or Islamofacism...trust me, you'd find something to be paranoid about.
I don't hate women. Not at all. I merely took the rose colored glasses off that women DEPEND on their men continuing to wear in order not to be able to face reality.
Face it, women leech off society, and a BIG part of that is women depending on men to maintain a vast false facade, ONE THAT EVENTUALLY ERODES AND DESTROYS THE VERY MEN SUPPORTING THE FACADE ON BEHALF OF WOMEN. this is one core reason I am driven to find out the core truths beyond feminism.
The weirdest thing though is the continued emphasis (by trolls) on how women "have" some sexual thing (our vaginas, I guess) that we "control" and keep from men....
Actually, no. Men are not entitled to 'it' automatically, but there ought to be understanding among women that men's and women's sexuality is fundamentally different. Such understanding would understandably lead to different attitudes in women in society.
There can be no doubt though that much of discourse between the sexes is driven by women knowing men want more sex and therefore women are able to sometimes use this as a tool or weapon, which leads to cynicism, etc.
Also, when women do sleep with men, they have no clue often times how to choose good men. That or they bitch for nothing. One thing is known, the Idiocracy model, where the half breeds and sociopaths of society have dozens of bastard offspring and the better men are lucky to have one or two, does hold, which makes for a ready market for the next generation of women to bitch over how they have no control over life or the planet or government or men-- which is RICHLY IRONIC.
but of course, since women have no sexual desires, it is impossible to imagine a woman (older, plainer, heavier) who wants what MEN HAVE -- a penis -- and can't have that, anymore than a poor man can get the vagina of a supermodel.
A poor, unattractive man has a bit over ZERO chance of bedding a supermodel or of bedding, frankly, ANYONE even remotely decent. Any old woman, age not withstanding, can at least bed some of the more depraved members of the male species, some of which can be quite nice or attractive.
And women do not have the secondary market of prostitution. Male prostitutes who service only lonely old wrinkly fat women simply do not exist.
BULLSHIT. TOTAL UTTER BULLSHIT. There is no market for it. Believe me, a lot of guys do not care if they bed 400 lb. heifers if it gets them sex. HOW MUCH MORE DESIRABLE WOULD IT BE for these men to actually EARN money fucking?!? It blows the mind. I find your baldly false pronouncement to be laughable in the extreme.
Women largely just do not give a flip about penetrative sex. They want romance and wine and roses with the sex as an afterthought.
If a woman isn't beautiful, she's pretty much shit-out-of-luck in that department. As Gemma Kaye Brown intelligently observes, men may get richer over time but women lose their looks and youth, and get discarded. There are 80 year old millionaires, like Hugh Hefner, who can still pay gorgeous girls to service him -- but I'll bet my last nickel that Leona Helmsley had no such thing.
But she could have. She did not WANT it. that is a whole different story.
Much of the initial coverage about Fort Hood turned out to be wrong. Is there anything wrong with that?
The accountability imposed by another country for the CIA's kidnapping and torture reveals much about our own.
Fox News' morning show plays to type, talking about whether Muslims in the Army should face "special debriefings"
The survivor and author is upset about comparisons some on the right are making to genocide
Once seen as a lunatic fringe, reactionary anti-women groups are courting respectability
Salon headlines in your mailbox
