- Top Features:
- War Room
- Glenn Greenwald
- Broadsheet
- Joan Walsh
- Camille Paglia
- Since You Asked
- Follow Salon:
Letters posted here are associated with the following article:
The letters thread is now closed.
This seems like an incredibly stupid idea, for the patrons. All but the cheapest of ladies' undergarments I've seen (in my limited experience) cost more than a drink. Who would trade $10 undies for a $5 beverage?
They managed to get into the paper.
Seriously - how many women do you think will really take up the offer? Compare the cost of those drinks to the absurd amount of free publicity they are getting (of which you just delivered your share).
Any questions?
For the seagulls. Someone's bound to lose an eye.
Because if you’re that quick to take off your undies you don’t have to worry about paying for drinks in the first place ;)
Brilliant! The bar could do "Tightey-Whitey Thursdays"!
Free drinks for your jockey-shorts (although I think the ladies would abscond to another pub upon first sight of skid marks, LMAO...)
-------------
Ahhh, there are few things in our lives more deserving of ridicule than tightey-whiteys - whether they be men's underwear, OR Bill O'Reilly and Newt Gingrich.
=)
obviously you are not a horny guy.
... as long as men have the same option. (ie. free drinks for shedding their undies)
if my grandmother wanted to get drunk for free...
Are those like Disney Dollars?
Wear multiple pairs of underwear. Then you get the free drinks and don't expose yourself. Plus the outermost layer would be cleaner.
which era, exactly, was marked by women trading their underclothes in exchange for free alcohol
The 70s. Duh!
