Read other letters about this article
I think this story relates to an earlier Broadsheet article about the pay discepency between high level male and female executives. Could it be that because "feminists" have placed so much emphasis on making huge salaries in the corporate world that they have failed to encourage young women to consider lower-paying (but, possibly far more satisfying and useful) careers in the arts? One of the gaping flaws I see in the Women's Movement is it's unquestioning embrace of capitalism and success by male standards. How can any movement be truly revolutionary if it has the same goals as the establishment it claims to be attempiting to overthrow?