- Top Features:
- War Room
- Glenn Greenwald
- Broadsheet
- Joan Walsh
- Camille Paglia
- Since You Asked
- Follow Salon:
Read other letters about this article
Let me see if I can summarize the points in the post (so if I end up commenting on something that wasn't there, you all can let me know):
(a) Blogher didn't get the respect it deserved in Jesella's article, not so much because of where it was placed (it had to be Styles anyway, since that's where she was working), but because of her excessive attention to (stereo)typically female topics and 'cute' details like the infamous bathroom message;
(b) Netroots Nation, on the other hand, got a much more even article, which took it much more seriously than Jesella's article did BlogHer.
Hmm... let's see. I'll address some of the questions in the post.
Why should Netroots receive more attention? As Rebecca said, it had more important people, journalists, etc. Because there was a larger emphasis on politics, economy, science, business, etc. -- topics which interest more people. And -- pace badstoad -- maybe they should. These are things that concern us as a community, that may affect our lives in unpredicted ways, and in which we're supposed to participate as citizens. I note even here at Salon that, say, articles on politics get far more comments than articles on health. So, given the larger political impact, I am not surprised that Netroots got more coverage. Just like the G-8 usually gets more coverage than the Mercosur.
But why shouldn't BlogHer be as powerful? There are many women who surf the net, read blogs or write them. But they talk about frivolities... well, they shouldn't. If more of them talk about serious things, their impact will increase. The number of New Yorker caricatures will decrease, and they will increasingly give the impression of being in poor taste. So here is an appeal: women bloggers, first ladies et al., please go against the mainstream expectations and talk about politics, jobs, the economy, etc., in your blogs. The more the better. Express opinions, contrast facts, research events, present predictions, compare polls, analyze tendencies. Go ahead! Change the mainstream interpretation!
I'm not against blogs on other topics -- health, lifestyle, etc. But if these topics do not get the coverage that politics, economics, etc. does (and I think there is a reason why they do), then the more women bloggers get involved in these topics, the more power BlogHer will have. And the coverage will become better.
A final question -- how hard is it for a woman to be a serious political blogger, as opposed to, for example, a serious political reporter or journalist? Is it really harder? (What would Salon's Joan Walsh say?)
