This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Wednesday, July 30, 2008 12:00 AM

A blogosphere of their own

Outrage over the N.Y. Times' story on the all-female BlogHer convention prompts the question: Are women on the Web just not taken quite as seriously as men?

Read other letters about this article

  • Tuesday, July 29, 2008 08:05 PM

    @badstoat

    You make an interesting point that I've encountered in a particular segment of feminist writing (Cixous and Irrigaray, for example), but I'm gonna have to respectfully disagree. The idea that the personal and emotional aspects of life are devalued because they are culturally associated with women (rather than vice versa) may be provocative, but is neither believable nor helps us break free of the cycle, since it doesn't explain why those aspects would be associated with women in the first place. Furthermore, it reeks of gender essentialism, since it seems to argue that these are essentially "feminine" traits that need to be taken seriously. At some point you really have to just face the reality that politics, economics, and science affect the masses in the same way, while everyone's personal and emotional lives are unique and not necessarily generalizable. And from a practical standpoint, I think it's much easier for women to keep trying to break certain glass ceilings than to try to change the entire focus of Western civilization, especially since now we apparently know that they are equally good at math and science after all.

    As for the post itself, this is the first well-balanced and insightful Broadsheet piece I've seen in a while. I think it strikes at the heart of the internal conflict within feminism that I noted above: are women abetting their own second-class status by focusing on "feminine" topics and gender-specific activities rather than attempting to speak to universal issues, or is attempting to compete with men on equal terms simply letting the patriarchy determine the rules of the game? You can't have it both ways, as Hilary Clinton found out.

    Also, it looks like we have a new troll in the neighborhood. Welcome, King Leonidas, I'm sure you'll find plenty of like-minded people here who only read the headline and proceed to fire off a stream of 4th grade-level sarcasm. Maybe you and James T. Kirk can hang out.

Most Active Letters Threads

516

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
426

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
385

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
210

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
177

Bigotry wins in Switzerland

By voting to ban the construction of minarets, Switzerland apes the most extreme intolerance in the Muslim world

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon