Letters posted here are associated with the following article:

26
Letters
Monday, July 28, 2008 12:00 AM

Don't lose your head (scarves)

Two Michigan Muslim women allege McDonald's refused to employee them because they wore the hijab. The kicker? It was a halal McDonald's.

The letters thread is now closed.

View:
Monday, July 28, 2008 10:43 AM

Racism more likely

Having grown up in Dearborn, I think it was because the two women are African-American converts to Islam, and the hijabs were just an excuse.

There have never been great relations between the local Arab (Muslim or Christian) and African-American communities. The former seem to have bought into a lot of preexisting American racism, the latter have seen the Arabs, about the only convenience store and small market owners in the city, as over-charging outsiders taking advantage of them.

Monday, July 28, 2008 10:46 AM

Key word: alleging

Just because two women allege that they weren't hired for wearing the hijab, doesn't mean that it's really the reason. If Broadsheet is going to run an article on this, don't they need to find out the other side of the story? Isn't that basic journalism?

Monday, July 28, 2008 10:57 AM

Rules for uniforms

I'm sure McDonald's has a company wide policy on what constitutes a proper uniform. I doubt it includes scarves or other head coverings. If they let these girls wear what they want to then they will have to let everyone wear whatever they want.

Monday, July 28, 2008 10:58 AM

Halal McDonalds?

Do you think American Muslims are tourists in their own country?

More like Khanzeer McDonalds.

McDonald's isn't fit for a pig.

Monday, July 28, 2008 11:05 AM

@Khyter

If they are "American Muslims", then, yes, I do think they're tourists, because this isn't their country. If they're Muslim Americans, then no.

Monday, July 28, 2008 11:06 AM

what about safety concerns?

Hmmm...it seems that a HALAL restaurant in Dearborn, Michigan (a community with one of the biggest Arab and/or Muslim populations in the country) would be a good place to find hijab-wearing women, so it's not like a headscarf would offend the customer base.

Plus, one would think that a headscarf would do more for keeping hair out of the food than the baseball caps and visors most McDonald's employees wear.

My guess though is that a long, flowing headscarf would be considered a safety hazard, whatwith the hot grease in the open fryers and the griddles and such. Perhaps if the scarf were tucked into the McDonald's uniform shirt it wouldn't be a problem.

Monday, July 28, 2008 11:08 AM

what about safety concerns?

Hmmm...it seems that a HALAL restaurant in Dearborn, Michigan (a community with one of the biggest Arab and/or Muslim populations in the country) would be a good place to find hijab-wearing women, so it's not like a headscarf would offend the customer base.

Plus, one would think that a headscarf would do more for keeping hair out of the food than the baseball caps and visors most McDonald's employees wear.

My guess though is that a long, flowing headscarf would be considered a safety hazard, whatwith the hot grease in the open fryers and the griddles and such. Perhaps if the scarf were tucked into the McDonald's uniform shirt it wouldn't be a problem.

Monday, July 28, 2008 11:10 AM

What do McDonalds employees usually wear?

Chilly Dog has a good point. They usually wear visors or baseball-style caps, no? I believe the main point of the hijab is to cover the hair.

I bet this McDonalds has other Muslim women employees. What do they wear? It appears this particular manager said exactly the wrong thing to exactly the wrong people. I guess he could have told them they needed to wear regular McDonalds headwear, with maybe a dewrag underneath, if they wanted to cover all their hair.

Monday, July 28, 2008 11:39 AM

not the only reason

or they could have not been hired because the owner did a background check and found something shady, they lied on their application, were rude at the interview, couldn't work the necessary hours, weren't citizens or a host of other reasons that millions of other americans don't get hired over. might want to look into that before starting a flap.

Monday, July 28, 2008 11:43 AM

more info

I agree with other letter writers that we would need a lot more information about the situation to be able to figure out of sexism or religious bias was at play here. For all we know these hijab-wearing prospective employees just didn't hire them because they didn't seem responsible or lacked recommendations or whatever. Or maybe they just weren't hiring.

Also there is an error in your headline: Two Michigan Muslim women allege McDonald's refused to employee them because they wore the hijab. The kicker? It was a halal McDonald's.

Employee should be employ.

Monday, July 28, 2008 12:29 PM

did they make 'em wear hair nets instead?

forget religious reasons, let's keep long hair contained in kitchens, even McDonald's kitchens.

Monday, July 28, 2008 12:55 PM

I'm waiting for the piece that complains that the hijab

Caused a weak feminine Muslim factory worker to get decapitated in an industrial accident where some nasty machine sucked it in. Because THAT would be bad.

Monday, July 28, 2008 12:58 PM

BTW just because you are observant

Doesn't mean you would know more than the already established regulations. Either a place is Halal or it's not. It's not a 'mostly' sort of Halal. Because if it's not in any small way, it's not Halal at all. Period. Though I can appreciate the nature of not having people come work who stuffed a ham and cheeses sandwich in their pocket.

Monday, July 28, 2008 01:59 PM

religious headgear and fast food

I'm sure McDonald's has a company wide policy on what constitutes a proper uniform. I doubt it includes scarves or other head coverings.

Here in Boston, it's not unusual to see a women in a hijab working at a fast food restaurant. I've seen plenty of hijab-clad women working at McDonald's. When I worked at Peet's, religious headcoverings were the only "hats" allowed. As far as I can tell, Wendy's allows religious headcoverings.

Monday, July 28, 2008 02:24 PM

How is this a women's issue exactly suitable for Broadsheet?

Let's recap: Two women from a sexist, homophobic, supremacist religion engaged in an act of rank superstition with grossly inegalitarian meaning can't get a job at a McDonald's. So what? My agnostic heart bleeds.

The alleged problems of these women has nothing to do with feminism. This piece belongs at a conservative/Muslim website where the 'believers' can all commiserate about how the cruel 'secular humanist' establishment puts them down at every turn. Joining a business usually means following a dress code, which in the service industry often means uniformity. Why does religion privilege you above any other feeling or belief to break these rules and norms?

Besides were these two Christian fundamentalists this piece would not be here at Salon, at all, period.

Monday, July 28, 2008 03:33 PM

Customer base?

"Hmmm...it seems that a HALAL restaurant in Dearborn, Michigan (a community with one of the biggest Arab and/or Muslim populations in the country) would be a good place to find hijab-wearing women, so it's not like a headscarf would offend the customer base."

I'm not so sure about that. Just because the muslim customer base isn't offended by the head scarf doesn't mean they wouldn't be offended to see women working. Particularly if they are in a coed environment where they must interact with strange me. Couldn't conservative muslims be offended to see that?

Most Active Letters Threads

680

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
543

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
440

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
287

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
254

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon