Then she has her sexual satisfaction.
Or are they meaning EVERY MAN IN THE COUNTRY also gets free and easy access to prostitutes who will guarantee the men 'sexual satisfaction'?
The problem with these retarded laws is they begin well meaning (or PRETEND to be well meaning) then their TRUE FANGS come out and they become cudgels with which to beat men (and ONLY MEN) over the head with.
This is one way women sneak shit past men then force the issue over and over while the men suffer inder a law they have not a clue how or why it got there in the first place. (and of course the women try to derail the questioning, pretending it was the men who wanted this law. TWISTED and EVIL, I know..)
Then again, make the law GENDER NEUTRAL and we can talk about setting up the legions of free whores in order to guarantee that ALL the men are sexually satisfied, EVEN the ugly nasty ones nobody wants.
Much of the initial coverage about Fort Hood turned out to be wrong. Is there anything wrong with that?
The accountability imposed by another country for the CIA's kidnapping and torture reveals much about our own.
Fox News' morning show plays to type, talking about whether Muslims in the Army should face "special debriefings"
219 Democrats and one Republican join in favor of the legislation, which passed by a narrow margin
The survivor and author is upset about comparisons some on the right are making to genocide
Salon headlines in your mailbox