This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Monday, March 10, 2008 12:00 AM

The sexual politics of household chores

One writer reenacts a day in the life of a 1950s housewife. Meanwhile, will doing the dishes get men laid?

Read other letters about this article

  • Monday, March 10, 2008 06:12 PM

    @ Dick

    You did say it, sorry I didn't read very carefully.

    We disagree about what is possible obviously, and while you are more straightford in your (in my opinion delusional)views than most the reality is that even though many women argue that gender is entirely socially constructed most don't really believe it when confronted with specifics. You do apparently,

    And where is my evidence, you may ask? I look at myself, my family, my boyfriend, some of the women I know. I am much more aggressive than my boyfriend, much better at math, much more organized, planning the future. I tell him about his finances and explain investment vehicles. I'm going into a very male-dominated field. My boyfriend is the English major, the more emotional and (what i consider) sappy person, verbal, loves to cook, drink wine, etc. His mother and my mother are both strong-willed heads of the household who were in charge of the family completely, not just at the "hearth." Both worked throughout our childhoods. Both my grandmothers were engineers.

    Most of my female friends have a ton of interests other than marriage, children and home-making. Sure, most women I know do want these things, but a sizeable minority from various countries, educational and socio-economic and religious backgrounds do not.

    All this is evidence to me that women are not "all like this" or "all like Y" and having different role models than most American men and women had in their parents can make your life perceptions and your WHOLE SELF very different from the typical woman.

    honest but delusional, although maybe not so delusional, after all; taking the position you do allows you to maintain intellectual consistency when you argue that all difference is constucted, and since men and women are different you will never be proved right but since no "acultural" humans will ever be available to study you can never be absolutely proven wrong either.

    Actually, there are acultural humans - newborns. Sure, you can talk about how eating a lot of fish sauce vs. curry vs. foie gras can make a difference in utero, but beyond that, studies are performed on newborns, who have the least cultural influences humans can possibly have. I would love to see more research into that. Plus, if you study cross-culturally, you can see some of your stereotypes fall away.

Most Active Letters Threads

523

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
426

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
417

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
210

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
185

Bigotry wins in Switzerland

By voting to ban the construction of minarets, Switzerland apes the most extreme intolerance in the Muslim world

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon