This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Wednesday, March 5, 2008 12:00 AM

Dowd: Are (Hillary's) women necessary?

MoDo ponders the frivolity and fashion blunders of the Clinton set.
Rebecca Traister

Read other letters about this article

  • Wednesday, March 5, 2008 03:23 PM

    feminism

    Why don't women with big bottoms and hips like Hillary wear loose dresses; they would look so much better. Better yet, why do woman wear pants suits. Dresses are more attractive and in no way inhibit movement in normal working conditions. There is something evil in the pants suit mania.

    —turnip Read turnip's other letters

    Flag
Read other letters about this article

Most Active Letters Threads

683

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
Glenn Greenwald Read article
543

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
Glenn Greenwald Read article
478

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
Glenn Greenwald Read article
440

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
Glenn Greenwald Read article
294

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame
Joan Walsh Read article

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon