Letters to the Editor
-
You conflate and confuse a lot of things.
"Typically men can cause some small scale trouble, but only women can eviscerate a nation from within."
But I expected this.
Those rulers who attack other nations do not destroy their own nation typically but other nations. It is an asset grab.
Those that destroy within their nation often pick on the weakest, the stragglers, the ones despised by the nation's elites. Mao or Hitler or Stalin did not attack their allies in their respective countries, they picked on the rejects, those the nation had rejected. Women and men have arguably equal say as to who becomes the untouchable and thus who is exposed to this sort of abomination.
Men generally have an impact or influence on a nation as a whole when they are powerful. When they do do something, it is with the tacit acceptance of those who are with them, their fellow elites, BOTH MEN AND WOMEN, their wives, girlfriends, daughters, friends.
Men low in the power structure, the bubba on the corner standing outside the 7-11, have near ZERO influence comparatively speaking.
WOMEN, on the other hand, when in the company of power, (the Bush wives say), have a big say in what goes on, if only because they want to preserve their own status and power and lives.
Lower down, women, who seem to follow each other lemming fashion, emulate their alpha females. So, in America we have a wholesale breakdown of family, decency, culture thanks to the Britneys of this country.
Since women, not men, control the household, through their monopoly on procreation, sex, and love, and thus on household stability, it is the women who run nations into the ground.
The near nationwide marriage and childbearing strike women in Japan are engaging in today is CRIPPLING that society. If you want proof of women's collective power.
The ONLY comparable power men low on the totem pole have in a nation is if they unite and collectively engage in a grass roots rebellion using high powered weaponry. Do you see that happening in America today? Tell me if you do.
Otherwise men are pissed and isolated. Women, who seem to follow herd instinct, have much more sway over the course of a nation.
I know this is not politically correct, but it is the way it is.
Explain where I am wrong, please.