Letters to the Editor
-
Against genital terrorism
All persons have a right to uninterrupted sexual development. Women have a right to their own bodies if and only if men do.
The fact that involuntary circumcision is controversial, meaning that substantial numbers of equally-informed, impartial rational persons disagree whether it is an unjustified violation of moral rules means that it cannot be a strongly justified violation of moral rules. Amputating a limb to save a life is strongly justified: virtually no impartial rational person would consider amputating a limb to save a live an unjustified violation of moral rules (it violates do not cause pain, do not disable, etc).
Circumcision is not in this category--the very best argument in its favor leaves it in the position of a weakly justified violation of moral rules. Consequently, it is not morally wrong to punish involuntary circumcision.