You're insane.

Post what you like, but based on that last little insight into your mind, I'd advocate banning you for awhile.

I hope you can find peace.

But we know you guys' (Blunderdog and sjtx) user handles, and I will keep reminding people that you trolls are lying pieces of sh*t who attacked a 23 year old woman because she stood up FOR herself.

From a very reliable source I have heard that sjtx is impotent and has never gotten it up in his life. I also heard that Blunderdog leads a double life as a male prostitute and sucks cock for five dollars.

How does it feel, assholes?

But we know you guys' (Blunderdog and sjtx) user handles, and I will keep reminding people that you trolls are lying pieces of sh*t who attacked a 23 year old woman because she stood for up herself.

Both of you trolls are attacking a 23 year old woman with libel and your bull sh*t.

I hate libel and bull sh*t, so of course I am going to call you spineless, bullying, lying, pieces of sh*t out whenever you assholes try to hurt someone with your lies.

Lets keep this on records for you guys: Blunderdog you're a piece lying sh*t for saying that Kyla Ebbert has profited off of standing up against the harmful behavior SW airlines employees showed her. She hasn't made any money off the story she gave news source, and the money she is making from playboy is money she is earning by working for it.

sjtx your a piece of lying sh*t for claiming that hearsay (hearsay I believe you fabricated) was proof that Kyla Ebbert did not wear panties under her skirt. No one has said that Kyla Ebbert didn't wear panties, and you admitted that you heard the rumor from someone else, so your spreading of a baseless rumor makes you guilty of libel, slander, and defamation. Which makes you a lying piece of sh*t.

But we know you guys' user handles, and I will keep reminding people that you trolls are lying pieces of sh*t who attacked a 23 year old woman because she stood up herself.

Go back to the toilet, where you guys belong, you lying pieces of shit.

You know, it's sad -- I've read through a lot of your past letters and I agree with plenty you have to say. But see, when you start doing nothing but name-calling and threatening people with libel suits for comments on a message board and cursing people who just stated their opinion (as you're doing as well), well, it really diminishes the points you're trying to make. And god, I stopped counting after five or six libel threats you made. Seriously? Your hostility is making you small. And that's not libel, Fetboy. That's the truth.

What is your problem? Are you all right?

Settle down. Easy there. Relax. I'm not out to get you, as much as you seem to want that.

I'll keep posting my opinions here, and if you disagree with me, you could feel free to explain why/how, but ease up. Nothing here is worth baring your teeth for.

If she really didn't have panties on, then that would have been front page news, and SW airlines definitely would have made a stink about it.

Don't be spreading BS sjtx, you might get a libel suit slapped on your ass.

What hasn't been said so far is the real reason the outfit was an issue in the first place -- not because it was short or skimpy, but because she wasn't wearing panties under the very, very short skirt. I couldn't care less how short someone's skirt is, but if I'm going to be sitting on that airplane seat, well, I guess I'd like to know that someone's bodily fluids won't be there waiting for me. This info is from a very, very good source at SW -- I suppose that such info makes for an icky news story.

Your Bull Sh*t is starting to sound funny

"Regardless, Ebberts has benefited dramatically from the national attention her provocative outfit won her."

Benefited dramatically? Oh really, how?

Has anyone paid her yet for complaining about being wronged by SW airlines (and lets not forget she was wronged)? Answer; no!

She got a photo shoot from playboy, but I hardly consider that "benefiting." She's working in that shoot, and every penny she earns from Playboy is honest money made.

I hired a lawyer to help me write a will, and I have talked to lawyers about everything that I needed legal or civil advice on.

I give. You're right. Hiring a lawyer to discuss legal options against the airline after her treatment it not indicative of a desire on her part to sue for money.

I hire lawyers to discuss legal options against businesses I buy products/services from all the time. And I've never "planned to sue." I'm sure this is true of the majority of Americans. How many times have you done it, fetboy?

Not to neglect her response on Oprah when she was asked if she'd be happy to forget about the whole thing (this occurred after she hired a lawyer but before she'd decided not to sue). Although she didn't answer that question with the resounding "no" that one would expect from a person who had no intention of suing anyone, she hedged with the shrewdness any reasonable person with no desire to sue would employ.

Regardless, Ebberts has benefited dramatically from the national attention her provocative outfit won her. While I stand corrected regarding her legal strategies, I steadfastly maintain the opinion that she's a joke. Ain't no principles she's representing that could help make the world a better place.

@XJS AND ME

Hey moron, check your parody detector.

--Anonymous

I found it.

It's on your birth certificate.

Now, get back in your cage, little twerp.

I have subscribed to PB for many many years.

I am going to make "THE" statement here:

I read the articles.

WOWIE!!

There is bait for the "hate daddy" club.

I don't like big breasts and, PB publishes 99.99% of their pics of these potential knee bangers.

as for the articles, (intentional caps here)IT IS ONLY THOSE WHO HAVE NEVER ACTUALLY OPENED AN ISSUE OF PB, LET ALONE READ AN ARTICLE IN PB WHO ARE THE FINGER POONTING, NAME-CALLING ACCUSERS!!

Examples in the November issue:

Paull Wolfowitz

A story about "liberals"

An interview about, GASP!!, sports~Matt Leinart

For the pervettes:An interview with Robert Redford

An article about Fred Thompson

Something called "Fanning the Flames"

which was a nice little thing about the Zippo lighters we carried(Yes, I'm a Vietnam vet).

Finally, a joke the femininazis will just LUUUUUUUUV:

"Worried about her marriage, a woman visited a psychic.

"There's no easy way to say this so, I'll just be blunt," the the seer said.

"Prepare yourself to be a widow. Your husband will die a violent and horrible death this year."

Shaken, the weife gasped, "Will I be acquitted?"

Now for the December issue.

Oh, screw it. They'll never get past their anger and hate to be able to see reality.