Letters to the Editor
This letter is associated with the following article:
-
The hard hitting rebuttal to the Psychology Today left me cold
Was there anything in there except for rhetorical questions and unsupported alternate explanations for the conclusions? Hardly more rigorous than the article in question (which at least claims to be based on research).
I don't think attacking Evolutionary Psychology (which, by the way I think is a growing rather than shrinking discipline, although I may be wrong. Carol Lloyd seems to think it is a holdover from the 1800s or something) by fostering reasonable doubt is a meaningful rebuttal. This isn't a murder case.