Letters to the Editor
-
Pyrian
In Article 11 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, it is stated "Everyone charged with a penal offense has the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law in a public trial at which he has had all the guarantees necessary for his defense." A private hearing allowed in which the the accused is not present and hearsay is admissible as evidence nullifies the presumption of innocence, as do lack of evidentiary due process and lack of a jury of one's peers.
I don't know of any legal systems where there is an actual de jure presumption of guilt, but rather there is usually a de facto presumption of guilt due to procedural barriers to establishing innocence, such as in the situation I described above.

