This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Friday, April 6, 2007 12:00 AM

Military rape a result of "feminist pressures"?

Sexual assault the natural outcome of putting women in combat, argues an Op-Ed.

Read other letters about this article

  • Friday, April 6, 2007 11:47 AM

    Overgeneralizing, Pretty Lady

    ... and so is Parker. The physical differences between men and women on a gender-wide basis don't matter, because the military is perfectly capable of determining how capable each individual solder, man or woman, is. Surely some women are more physically capable than some men, and there are no reasons to keep them from combat positions they're qualified for just because of that sweeping generalization, and no male soldier (unless he's plain sexist) is going to resent that woman's presence. I don't know whether the milltary is actually gender-blind in this respect, but it should be, and it would make the gender-based claims irrelevant. And furthermore, the military should be good at finding front-line positions for less physically capable men and woman that don't require the highest level of strength and fitness, anyway.

Most Active Letters Threads

740

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
437

Do Obama officials know what his Afghanistan plan is?

What explains the completely contradictory statements from key aides on a central plank of the war strategy?
408

America's regression

It's almost impossible to find a nation with as many torture advocates as the U.S. has.
332

Palin: Birthers have "fair question" about Obama

Of Obama birth, the ex-governor says, "the public is still, rightfully, making it an issue" (Updated)
211

The poster boy for progressive self-delusion

Read Hayden's 2008 Obama endorsement to remember the way the left sold our centrist president to itself

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon