This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Thursday, April 5, 2007 12:00 AM

New York's circumcision campaign

City health officials embrace circumcision to fight HIV.

Read other letters about this article

  • Thursday, April 5, 2007 06:37 PM

    Might circumcision actually increase the risk...

    by providing a false sense on invicibility. More thoughtful and educated people will already use condoms or rather practise safe sex in general. People who can be convinced by a policy to have a surgery (on their genitals no less) are not prime candidates to be trusted to make rational decisions afterwards.

    As for public health officials, it seems unconscionable to promote an irrevocable surgery when a much more effective and infinitely less invasive means of protection (i.e. condoms) exists (not to mention responsible personal conduct). As always in the circumcision debate I wonder how much greed (money and power for the medical establishment) is at the heart of proponents efforts.

Most Active Letters Threads

348

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
323

Tough-guy John Bolton, hiding under his bed

As usual, right-wing pseudo-warriors are drowning in extreme cowardice.
163

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
154

Phil Carter's resignation from key detainee policy post

Many of the "War on Terror" policies he spent years condemning were ones expressly embraced by Obama.
99

Palin, Prejean: Beastly treatment for beauties

The governor turned author must fight what the pageant queen learned: Politics and hotness make strange bedfellows

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon