Letters posted here are associated with the following article:

5
Letters
Monday, January 8, 2007 12:00 AM

The Democrats get macho

The New York Times argues that the true "milestone in gender politics" is the rise of alpha-male Dems.

The letters thread is now closed.

View:
Monday, January 8, 2007 02:45 PM

NYT get a grip

actually its just 1 single guy who has both the buzz cut and missing fingers - freshman Senator Jon Tester of Montana. And before being elected he was, and still is, (how can I say this in a way that so as not to upset the NYT's new macho zeitgeist?) - an organic farmer!

Monday, January 8, 2007 03:20 PM

RE: NYT get a grip

Thanks for catching that! The language has been tweaked.

Monday, January 8, 2007 03:31 PM

Media vs. Policy

They're so desperate to avoid covering things that matter - like legislation and policy - that they'll bite any trend, real or imaginary, which will supposedly enlighten people indirectly without paying any attention to what's ACTUALLY going on. We wouldn't anybody voting on reality, after all.

Monday, January 8, 2007 03:37 PM

True,

anti-intellectualism is not an exclusively male attribute. Feminists have been doing it for decades now. Too bad Hofstadter published his book in 1962. He misssed out on some real red meat.

I'm not being flippant; feminism, in addition to its good qualities, has been characterized by a Bush-like willingness to ignore inconvenient facts from the get-go. Also like Bush, feminists often repeat falsehoods until many take them to be true. You know, only 2% of rape claims are false, the wage gap is caused by sex discrimination, things like that.

So the fact that the Dems are machoing up is entirely consistent with their feminization. This isn't new, of course. Madeline Allbright went to war in the Balkans in part to demonstrate her cajones.

It's not all bad, though. Any trend that shows female politicians to be every bit as stupid and corrupt as male ones has something to be said for it.

Monday, January 8, 2007 04:48 PM

Nearly one in 5 US children live in poverty...

...18% in 2006, according to Columbia University's National Center for Children in Poverty. When Pelosi reminds us that "it is about the children," we need to pay attention.

Perhaps the historic advent of a female House Speaker is stirring up some insecurities ~ change always has the potential to disturb ~ or perhaps this is some backlash.

Feminism in challenging stereotypes is good for men and women, girls and boys, all genders. Why should Speaker Pelosi's pearls be any more remarkable than nice cufflinks ~ or a lapel flag any more remarkable than a Congressguy with an earring?

Most Active Letters Threads

683

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
543

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
440

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
389

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
283

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon