- Top Features:
- War Room
- Glenn Greenwald
- Broadsheet
- Joan Walsh
- Camille Paglia
- Since You Asked
- Follow Salon:
Read other letters about this article
I can't believe how frivolously you would advocate male genital mutulation. It doesn't have to be equivalent to a clitorectomy to be reviled; it's still permament maiming of the genitals, may not prevent orgasm but reduces pleasure, and reduces dunction (the foreskin has several very good purposes for being there in the first place), and when it's done to a baby it is nonconsensual. Not only that but cut men still get and give HIV. And to the guy who said cut men offer more pleasure because they can last longer, that's bs. It's more pleasurable to have intercourse with an uncut man because of the sheath-in-a-sheath, extra lubricated action that nature intended.
