This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Thursday, December 7, 2006 12:00 AM

Glaxo's guinea pigs

The pharma giant is accused of putting pregnant women at risk in unethical drug trials.

Read other letters about this article

  • Thursday, December 7, 2006 11:53 AM

    I am so sick of my blogs being invaded... --Paula

    Um, Paula?

    It's not "your blog." You are dumb enough to pay for otherwise free content, so I'll type this slowly since you obviously don't comprehend very fast.

    You don't have to read the "letters to the editor," which technically, isn't the blog. Broadsheet is the blog, and it's written by a host of women about a variety of topics. Occasionally ideas cross-pollinate. I know you're having trouble enough grasping one idea at a time. Tsk, tsk.

    And since you choose to read these letters, well, maybe you could choose to skip the ones that don't fall lockstep into your narrow range of thought...or maybe you could just exhale and accept the fact that there are people who disagree with you. That's actually a liberal idea, not a conservative one. And I am getting paid to type this, but that's only because I'm goofing off at work.

Most Active Letters Threads

740

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
688

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
364

America's regression

It's almost impossible to find a nation with as many torture advocates as the U.S. has.
329

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame
264

Do Obama officials know what his Afghanistan plan is?

What explains the completely contradictory statements from key aides on a central plank of the war strategy?

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon