Letters posted here are associated with the following article:

9
Letters
Wednesday, November 8, 2006 12:00 AM

Female arousal and male contraception

When it comes to scientific sex research, these days everything's going our way.

The letters thread is now closed.

View:
Wednesday, November 8, 2006 12:57 PM

Do women have that much trouble getting aroused?

I don't think I understand the point of the wrist patch. Maybe it's applicable for perimenopause and beyond? That would be cool. But I am not getting the scents (sorry - dumb joke) that perimenopausal and menopausal women are the targeted sniffers here. For gals who can't seem to get it up, so to speak, for their hubbies, how about some good old-fashioned nipple and clitoral stimulation from said hubbies? (And good old-fashioned household power-sharing is proven to work as well.) I must be missing something.

Wednesday, November 8, 2006 01:02 PM

Would women believe it

Oh baby I'm on the tablet, I swear.

Wednesday, November 8, 2006 01:05 PM

Female Sexual Arousal Disorder

That's what I was missing. The new Frigidity. Possibly "millions of women" have it. Well, maybe. In my house it's called utter physical exhaustion. My husband has it sometimes too.

In any case, there probably are some women out there who would like to be more aroused more often - wouldn't something like this help a lot of people stay on their Prozac? Great! - but I would hardly call this "scientific sex research." It is just an example of someone trying to make money on perfume.

Wednesday, November 8, 2006 01:06 PM

Alright!

The election is over. Let's get on with the pussy stories!

Wednesday, November 8, 2006 01:25 PM

does the patch make women (a lot) less picky

because if it doesn't, the fundamental dynamic of male female relationships can't change too much.

Thursday, November 9, 2006 12:03 PM

of course it could work

Basically, they're trying to create a legal alternative to provide what pot already provides for lots of women. If it stimulates some of the same brain chemicals (dopamine et.al.) then it should work just fine, and a lot better than Chanel.

Thursday, November 9, 2006 12:12 PM

If the goal here is to balance out male and female sexual desire

Why not introduce a patch that reduces men's testosterone levels? Better yet, if this new male contraceptive pill does just that, we won't have to worry about men who want it when their partners don't. They can just take the pill.

Didn't a recent study give some creedence to the idea that women get aroused as easily as men even if this doesn't lead them to desire to actually have sex? If this is true (I'm no scientist so I don't know), it looks like women don't need this patch as the reason for the apparent disparity in male and female libido has more to do with the way women's sexuality is repressed and circumscribed by society than it has to do with biological difference. If men can get effective contraception they control and a decrease in libido that puts them more in balance with their partners, I love the idea of the male pill even more.

Thursday, November 9, 2006 02:17 PM

the problem with getting rid of male sexual desire is that you will also get rid of the emotional attachment

to the object of the (former)desire. I actually think that this is what happens in a lot of relationships, the woman (once the sexual intensity cools a little)wants the man to be bonded with her in the way that a bigger, stronger, dominant intense woman best friend would be. The problem is that men are not women.

Thursday, November 9, 2006 05:21 PM

FEMALE DESIRE DEPENDS ON EVERYTHING BEING PERFECT

most men are not perfect. most circumstances are not perfect.

therein lies much of the problem.

couple this with feminism's tired lessons to women about how all men are bad and evil and therefore women should fear and hate them, and "Hussy, we have a problem"

(I know... very bad pun- in several ways)

you want a solution to tired women (and men)? less work, more leisure time.

Easy as that.

Most Active Letters Threads

423

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
210

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
206

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
111

How dare you criticize wasteful defense spending!

So you think it's only terrorist-appeasing lefties who are down on Pentagon profligacy? Think again
56

Police to talk to Woods

Early morning crash raises questions, and revives tabloid speculation

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon