This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Tuesday, November 7, 2006 12:00 AM

A case for parental notification

Why I'm voting for California Proposition 85.

Read other letters about this article

  • Tuesday, November 7, 2006 04:46 PM

    Read Between The Lines

    This has nothing to do with parental notification and everything to do with chipping away at Roe V. Wade.

    First, they require parental notification. Then, ooh, maybe they'll boost the age up to 21. Hm. Okay, that went through. Let's try getting the husband's consent in the case of a married woman needing an abortion. Good! Now, let's go for the consent of the boyfriend in the case of an unmarried woman needing an abortion. Yippee! Break out the beers for "men's rights". Now, let's see if we can force the woman to get three doctor's notes and pass it through a committee to get permission to get an abortion. Hee hee. Pulled a fast one on them. Let's require them to do a blood screening, get a permit, pass the committee, count backwards from 1,000, get the sperm provider's permission, get their parents' permission, have the Governor notarize it....

    You see where this is going, right?

Most Active Letters Threads

426

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
353

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
210

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
111

How dare you criticize wasteful defense spending!

So you think it's only terrorist-appeasing lefties who are down on Pentagon profligacy? Think again
59

Police to talk to Woods

Early morning crash raises questions, and revives tabloid speculation

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon