Letters posted here are associated with the following article:

7
Letters
Friday, September 15, 2006 12:00 AM

Fonda on feminism

The actress and activist shares her thoughts while campaigning for Sweden's feminist party.

The letters thread is now closed.

View:
Friday, September 15, 2006 10:40 PM

Those patriarchal Swedes...

God knows Sweden is a misogynistic place, needing immediate political reform vis-a-vis the status of women. Actually, I'm not being facetious...just referring to the Muslim enclaves in Malmo and elsewhere. Thank Christ Eve Ensler and Jane Fonda are on the case!

Friday, September 15, 2006 11:06 PM

Ancient Rome

...was a patriarchy. The male head of a Roman family had life and death powers over everyone else in the family (which could include cousins, in laws, etc. Think of the Godfather).

Sweden is not a patriarchy. The US is not a patriarchy either. Whatever the problems of women in Western society, patriarchalism ain't it.

The use of the word patriarchy is one reason feminism keeps equaling silly in many people's minds. It's strident, overblown, and doesn't even make sense.

Saturday, September 16, 2006 05:18 AM

Fonda and the Swedish Feminist Party

Pity that ms Fonda had no research done before lending her glamour power to a feminist movement every feminist has refused association

with by now and then I do not even mean the staggering notoriority of its chairwoman ms Gudrun Schyman.

Sweden alas is no longer the exciting promise created by Olof Palme, in turn infatuated with Shirley MacLaine before getting shot in the street by a drunkard in l986. Sic transit. Only Stockholm remains an utterly lovely city

Saturday, September 16, 2006 08:44 AM

The mother ship?

Hey, if there are any more sightings, let me know.

And yes, Ms. Fonda, not too shabby. Why don't you say that stuff over here, where we can really use you?

Sunday, September 17, 2006 03:31 PM

I'd like to believe what Fonda says,

but until feminists start fighting along side men for fathers' rights in family courts, I'm not going to be able to. And when they do that, I can suggest a few other things they could do to prove their gender-equality bona fides.

Monday, September 18, 2006 12:47 AM

a man can be thrown in jail for buying sex from a woman in Sweden

but the woman can't be prosecuted because she is the victim. If this is a patriarcy I can't, without reference to femdom porn, imagine what a non patriarcy would look like.

Tuesday, September 19, 2006 12:24 PM

Men are punished for their ligitimate needs and desires.

for wanting to be fathers and also wanting to assert their true selves.

women are NOT.

this is definitely NOT a patriarchy- not in Sweden, not in the USSA.

women could care less about YOUR rights as a male. YOU ARE A SLAVE until spoken to. (Unless you are very rich, of course, like Ted Turner. but all of us men are rich beyond belief, and hence powerful, huh?)

feminism is on the rocks for many reasons, this assininity being one of them.

Most Active Letters Threads

740

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
435

Do Obama officials know what his Afghanistan plan is?

What explains the completely contradictory statements from key aides on a central plank of the war strategy?
408

America's regression

It's almost impossible to find a nation with as many torture advocates as the U.S. has.
332

Palin: Birthers have "fair question" about Obama

Of Obama birth, the ex-governor says, "the public is still, rightfully, making it an issue" (Updated)
211

The poster boy for progressive self-delusion

Read Hayden's 2008 Obama endorsement to remember the way the left sold our centrist president to itself

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon