Letters posted here are associated with the following article:

57
Letters
Monday, May 8, 2006 12:00 AM

Hope for the homely

Research on male flycatchers topples Darwin's theory of sexual selection.

The letters thread is now closed.

View:
Monday, May 8, 2006 12:59 PM

Nature Shows

I watch a lot of nature/ hunting shows, and I can say that females mate all the time with males while "dominant" males are fighting each other.

Monday, May 8, 2006 01:06 PM

"Sexual selection has been blow out of the water" way overstates it.

Obviouly the situation is more complicated than may have been thought, which is pretty typical as more is discovered.

Monday, May 8, 2006 01:24 PM

Ugh

This is poor science reporting. You're trying to extrapolate some sort of political and social statement about humans from this, but failing due in no small part to a misunderstanding of the science.

Just for starters, you end by suggesting that women's sometimes preference for sweet funny guys shows that they aren't selecting for genetics. Humans have many sexually selected traits, some physical and some behavioral. It's pretty well accepted that a nightingale sings to woo the ladies, that the ladies select for the nightingale with the best song. If you accept the Sexy Son Hypothesis, the Darwinian logic for this is that the sons from the best singer will produce the greatest number of grandchildren. It's entirely consistent with the Sexy Son Hypothesis to say that sweetness and humor in humans is entirely the same. So your supposed example of how humans don't behave consistently with the Sexy Son Hypothesis is, in fact, a perfect example of the Sexy Son Hypothesis. Humor is a _perfect_ example of genetic bling.

When Roughgarden says "Each kind of male has its own way of going about its life. Each works out fine," she talking about how different species have different genetic strategies. Trying to draw conclusions from this to humans just makes you look foolish and scientifically illiterate.

Monday, May 8, 2006 02:10 PM

Darwin still wins

Topples Darwin's theory? Nonsense. Darwin made it clear: any trait that leads to having a greater number of breeding descendants is "fit." Survival of the fittest has nothing to do with bashing heads, beating up competitors, or showing your stuff unless that leads to more surviving and reproducing offspring. There's nothing really new about the conclusion, only the findings for each of those individual species. Truly, there is no "natural" pattern across animals -- only within species, and even there we are finding that variation is wider than we ever imagined.

Monday, May 8, 2006 02:19 PM

Hope for the Homely

Isn't that called beer?

http://www.art.com/asp/sp-asp/_/pd--10007026/Beer_Helping_Ugly_People.htm

Monday, May 8, 2006 02:44 PM

Salon, leave science reporting to those who understand what anthropomorphism is.

Was I suppose to draw some conclusion from these feel-good story that any (human) guy could tell you is complete bullshit? Deer and crickets and humans are all the same thing, right?

Move along. Nothing to see here.

Monday, May 8, 2006 02:44 PM

females mate all the time with males while "dominant" males are fighting each other.

dammn right! the patriarchy harms males as much as females! down with tyranny!!! We've made good progress with the female antelopes(or whatever) if only we could get through to the boys.

Monday, May 8, 2006 02:54 PM

In re this article

In your face, brightstar, and any other anti-feminist troll who whines about how women only like jocks!

Monday, May 8, 2006 03:10 PM

You go girl!!!

Yeah!!!

Monday, May 8, 2006 03:38 PM

ACTUALLY

nothing in this article suggests that the cliche does not hold true--

Everyone knows desirable women slam parts with the hot looking rude jerks then find a nice schlub to raise the rugrats she created with the jerk.

Monday, May 8, 2006 03:49 PM

Hey brightstar

So, i asked you some questions, and you didn't reply. Perhaps you didn't see my post from the other thread? I repost for you:

"Why do you hate women and particularly feminists so much?

Brightstar,

You're so depressing. Why do you hate feminists so much? Why are you filled with such vitriol for them? You just type out the same accusations and strawmen every time. What happened to you that you hate feminists so much? Moreover, you love to say how "all women" do this, and "all women" don't want to talk to you and would rather talk to jocks. Why do you have so much bitterness towards women? What happened to you? Did you have a particularly nasty breakup or divorce? Does this have something to do with your particular childhood?

You don't have to tell me or anyone, but i'm just curious. I think it might explain your very strong opinions on women and feminists. It seems so odd to hate a whole group of people, rather than individuals, with such a passion.

-- LeCastor"

Monday, May 8, 2006 04:01 PM

I replied

Why do you hate ME so much, Le Castor?

You would think a girl would like a guy like me, someone with some brains and guts, who is not so bad looking and who wants to do the dirty with an empowered free spirited happy woman who is self confident enough not to get shaken by her guy's comments and who is honest enough to understand that modern American style feminism has been a shit sandwich being shoved down guy's throats for some decades now.

Monday, May 8, 2006 04:05 PM

desirable women slam parts with the hot looking rude jerks then find a nice schlub to raise the rugrats she created with the jerk

by the way it has been established that this behavior, as well as lots of male defenses, or attempted defenses, against it is virtually univeral in all species in which the male helps raise the young. the only exceptions appear to be in cases where cheating is a virtual physical impossiblity due to extremely harsh conditions

Monday, May 8, 2006 04:07 PM

AWRIGHT THEN

You're so depressing. Why do you hate feminists so much? Why are you filled with such vitriol for them? You just type out the same accusations and strawmen every time. What happened to you that you hate feminists so much?

I look around and see a lot of miserable men and women in this country.

Moreover, you love to say how "all women" do this,

never said ALL women

and "all women" don't want to talk to you and would rather talk to jocks.

To jerks or jocks actually. Many women do want to talk to me. And if they are cute (even the chubby ones), they notice my weight (which is down to 203, woo hoo!!!) and ONLY want to TALK to me.

so women are vain, what else is new?

Why do you have so much bitterness towards women? What happened to you? Did you have a particularly nasty breakup or divorce? Does this have something to do with your particular childhood?

had my share of being used by women. but no more than any naive, nice guy (former nice guy).

You don't have to tell me or anyone, but i'm just curious. I think it might explain your very strong opinions on women and feminists. It seems so odd to hate a whole group of people, rather than individuals, with such a passion.

Not a group of people, a very destructive and one sided (anti-male) philosophy (modern feminism as opposed to classical feminism, that is).

Luv,

Most Active Letters Threads

426

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
273

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
210

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
111

How dare you criticize wasteful defense spending!

So you think it's only terrorist-appeasing lefties who are down on Pentagon profligacy? Think again
57

Police to talk to Woods

Early morning crash raises questions, and revives tabloid speculation

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon