This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Wednesday, April 26, 2006 12:00 AM

Teen sex cults!

Looks like the FDA has really lost it.

Read other letters about this article

  • Wednesday, April 26, 2006 03:50 PM

    Slightly off topic but shouldn't we have been suspicious of their intent from the beginning....

    I mean, c'mon, they put a person who's name is Janet Woodcock in a decision-making role on this issue. Stands to reason that, well, they may not necessarily be going to taking a lead role in regulating this interest in the best interest of women. I can just see our Beavis and Butthead administration going

    "Who should we put in charge of stonewalling women's reproductive drights in the name of our right-wing, lunatic fringe? I know, heh, heh, let's put Woodcock, in charge. Heh, heh, heh heh, yeah, Woodcock."

    Tragically,at this point in this administration, I'm not sure if I'm actually being completely snarky here or whether, given their record of relating to the American public, particularly on these sorts of issues, this could actually have happened.

Most Active Letters Threads

683

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
543

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
478

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
440

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
294

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon