This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Thursday, December 8, 2005 12:00 AM

A (really) few good men

For years men dominated college campuses. Why should we worry that women now have the educational upper hand?

Read other letters about this article

  • Thursday, December 8, 2005 11:50 AM

    Accomodating young boys' temperaments

    What does the author have in mind? Instruction by way of boxing match? Coeducation in elementary schools isn't a recent development. When I was a kid, boys could sit quietly, listen, and raise their hands as well as girls could. The difference was, if they didn't behave, the teacher could and often did beat the crap out of them. (Ah, Texas!) They hit girls, too. Our natural temperaments didn't count for squat. We paid attention.

    So we've progressed beyond the barbaric old methods, but we apparently haven't yet discovered a new method of emphasizing to kids that learning is a serious business. I agree it's not fair to simply let a generation of boys fail; I also don't think you can teach a kid who doesn't want to sit still and pay attention.

Most Active Letters Threads

740

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
688

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
369

America's regression

It's almost impossible to find a nation with as many torture advocates as the U.S. has.
329

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame
318

Do Obama officials know what his Afghanistan plan is?

What explains the completely contradictory statements from key aides on a central plank of the war strategy?

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon