This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Sunday, November 13, 2005 12:00 AM

Giving "chick flicks" flack

An L.A. Times story tackles the problematic labeling of "chick flicks."

Read other letters about this article

  • Monday, November 14, 2005 04:59 PM

    re "Chick Flicks"

    Oh, it is just too, too funny to see this article in Broadsheet -- you know, the column that "only legitimize[s] the already generally accepted notion that there are [articles] for everyone, and then there are [articles] for women. Like a miracle household product, it marginalizes as it defines."

Most Active Letters Threads

738

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
688

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
353

America's regression

It's almost impossible to find a nation with as many torture advocates as the U.S. has.
329

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame
210

The poster boy for progressive self-delusion

Read Hayden's 2008 Obama endorsement to remember the way the left sold our centrist president to itself

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon