This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Monday, October 24, 2005 12:00 AM

Introducing Salon's cheeky new women's blog

Read other letters about this article

  • Thursday, October 27, 2005 08:29 PM

    No,

    alas, I don't know from marketing.

    I mean "allow" in a practical, journalistic sense. We always have and will continue to have plenty of "gurls news," as you put it. I write a lot of it.

    What a blog format "allows" us to do is point quickly to a story like the Iceland story, a story we would not have had the resources to report on our own in a timely fashion. Someone else wrote a good story about it. A blog "allows" us to direct readers to that story.

    I think our disagreement isn't about the allowing, though. It's about the organizing principle of the blog: women's news. It's that organizing principle that you find flawed and retro that I find progressive and exciting.

    If you want to continue the discussion with me please feel free to write directly (rtraister@salon.com). I should also clarify that I have not written any stories about women crying in the office. That was someone else.

Most Active Letters Threads

674

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
543

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
439

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
212

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame
209

Bigotry wins in Switzerland

By voting to ban the construction of minarets, Switzerland apes the most extreme intolerance in the Muslim world

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon