This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Monday, October 24, 2005 12:00 AM

Introducing Salon's cheeky new women's blog

Read other letters about this article

  • Wednesday, October 26, 2005 06:43 AM

    Nice one!

    When i first saw the new Broadstreet section, i was not amused. Here we go again. As a male reader, I figure that a few Traister articles every now and then about how men are wimps, dont measure up, women are superior, etc, etc are par for the course, but that this was a little much. However, after seeing the reader response, i have changed my mind. And there is clearly no need for a baby-blue male counterpoint to this section, as some have suggested, since women have attacked it so effectively on their own. Catfight, indeed! Reminds me a little of the Harriet Miers bruhaha. I think i'll make another bag of popcorn.

Most Active Letters Threads

684

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
546

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
543

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
440

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
306

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon