This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Monday, October 24, 2005 12:00 AM

Introducing Salon's cheeky new women's blog

Read other letters about this article

  • Monday, October 24, 2005 10:50 PM

    Cheeky? Broads?

    I'm a long-time Salon reader, almost from the beginning. I remember when we called this whole section "Mothers Who Think." I liked the implications of that. I was sorry when it went from an intelligent section aimed mainly at women to some kind of generi-human interest thing.

    And now, we have some kind of cutesy title for news purportedly of special interest to women? Uhhh, I'm willing to give it the benefit of the doubt, but so far I'm expecting my intelligence to be insulted. We didn't need a typical women's section type thing here. I'm fine with the regular news, thanks all the same.

    If we must do this, can we put the implication that we think back in the title? Please? With stories and columns to match?

Most Active Letters Threads

361

I'm thankful I'm not President Obama

Backers deride Katrina-style negligence, haters hate him more each day. Can this presidency be saved? Of course
332

The extreme secrecy of the federal courts

Judges are not only permitted, but required, to conceal anything the government declares to be secret.
317

Greg Craig and Obama's worsening civil liberties record

A new Time account of the fall of Obama's White House counsel sheds much light on rule of law issues.
222

Praying for Obama's death

Pastors are invoking Psalm 109 -- "May his days be few" -- in hopes of saving our country, and our souls
202

Tough-guy John Bolton, hiding under his bed

As usual, right-wing pseudo-warriors are drowning in extreme cowardice.

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon