This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Monday, October 24, 2005 12:00 AM

Introducing Salon's cheeky new women's blog

Read other letters about this article

  • Tuesday, October 25, 2005 10:49 AM

    Deeply Offenden by Broadsheet

    The only thing more tasteless and offensive then the concept behind Broadsheet is the justifcation you used to introduce it. How dare you complain that "women's" news (whatever that is) is being ignored in favor of more traditional news and then announce your solution is to undereline your agreement with its lack of importance by packaging it off in own separate spot. I am a women and I am can not find the words to express how completely offended I am by the idea that information will be separated by gender. You may argue that your opening editoral welcomed men, but it is clear that you don't mean it. What's next the men's only section? Separate but equal news coverage? If something is worth covering then it worth being read by all your readers. And heres a hint articles that have the word "catfight" in them are not worth covering.

Most Active Letters Threads

359

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
323

Tough-guy John Bolton, hiding under his bed

As usual, right-wing pseudo-warriors are drowning in extreme cowardice.
172

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
154

Phil Carter's resignation from key detainee policy post

Many of the "War on Terror" policies he spent years condemning were ones expressly embraced by Obama.
99

Palin, Prejean: Beastly treatment for beauties

The governor turned author must fight what the pageant queen learned: Politics and hotness make strange bedfellows

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon