This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Monday, October 24, 2005 12:00 AM

Introducing Salon's cheeky new women's blog

Read other letters about this article

  • Tuesday, October 25, 2005 07:50 AM

    Eeeeeew. Lame.

    Funny how you don't have any "Editors choices" at all here, after several pages of protest about how offensive the art, the smug intro, and pink and the tired name are.

    --> Does anybody know where they are talking about this in tabletalk.salon.com yet? That could be side-splitting.

    I have no problems with the interest in talking about women in todays world -- and a little bit of international focus could make this worthwhile.

    (The WHAT ABOUT MEN remark is what's known as trolling, people. A diversion. Please!)

    The idea that your private email conversation was "a blog" shows how naive and insulated you folks have been.

    Sigh. Okay, okay. So I was rough on ya. Like a tough broad.

    Get over yourselves, lose the cliche pink and the super-cliche retro-girls artwork, and this might even be interesting.

Most Active Letters Threads

530

Do Obama officials know what his Afghanistan plan is?

What explains the completely contradictory statements from key aides on a central plank of the war strategy?
249

A new report questions "suicides" at Guantanamo

Why is the Obama DOJ attempting to block judicial review of three highly suspicious deaths?
218

I live in a van down by Duke University

How do I afford grad school without going into debt? A '94 Econoline, bulk food and creative civil disobedience
128

Is my kids making me not smart?

Stay-at-home fatherhood dulls my intellect to a nub. Excuse me while I ponder the subtext of "Hippos Go Berserk"
126

Trig, the anti-abortion straw baby

Sarah Palin's son is being used to demonize pro-choicers

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon