This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Monday, October 24, 2005 12:00 AM

Introducing Salon's cheeky new women's blog

The editors

Read other letters about this article

  • Tuesday, October 25, 2005 10:50 AM

    Disappointed

    Every Wednesday, when I open my Chicago Tribune, I wonder yet again why they bother printing a separate weekly section called "WomenNews." I'm disappointed to see Salon doing essentially the same thing. I don't understand why this is necessary. Isn't women's news just human news? If you need a place for celebrity gossip and fashion, use The Fix and create a style section. I've been reading Salon for years and have never wished for a special section devoted to my gender. Why would I need that?

    —strass Read strass's other letters

    Flag
Read other letters about this article

Most Active Letters Threads

688

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
Glenn Greenwald Read article
682

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
Glenn Greenwald Read article
440

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
Glenn Greenwald Read article
323

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame
Joan Walsh Read article
209

Bigotry wins in Switzerland

By voting to ban the construction of minarets, Switzerland apes the most extreme intolerance in the Muslim world
By Juan Cole Read article

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon