This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Saturday, February 18, 2006 12:00 AM

Abu Ghraib and Salon

By continuing to publish documentation of the abuse, we hope to shed light on a chapter in American history that this administration has tried to keep in the shadows.

Read other letters about this article

  • Saturday, February 18, 2006 10:46 AM

    The institutionalization of torture

    Having wished that Salon would simply post the whole sorry mess of photos and documents, I’ll accept that it's probably wise for you to take a more cautious approach. Once the vetting is complete, and you’ve published selected, interpreted excerpts, I hope Salon will do a more complete “dump” for the sake of further analysis.

    Meanwhile, for all the truth in Ms. Walsh's reflections of how the torture scandal demeans our service members and makes all American citizens somewhat culpable for these actions, there is a deeper, more ominous pattern emerging.

    For decades, our secret services (CIA, etc.) have routinely used torture of the now familiar sort, in collaboration with other nations and who knows what other free-lance paramilitary entities. We’ve known about it, but as this activity was limited in scope and officially “off the books,” the Pentagon and civilian leadership has had the protection of institutional deniability.

    Yet, since torture is ineffective for the stated goals of fighting terrorism, and actually amplifies the risk of more attacks, what could be the reason for the administration’s persistence? As with domestic spying and the questionable utility of having more data than can be analyzed, why are these policies being so vigorously pursued? The answer becomes obvious.

    This is not war-fighting nor police work. Torture is punishment. Spying is repression. These once exceptional activities are now being brought in from the cold, along with the rejection of international laws and the un-Constitutional abrogation of treaty obligations, to gradually become official doctrine. The existence of the PATRIOT Acts proves these doctrines are not meant solely for the pursuit of foreign aggression. Exceptional domestic powers claimed for wartime expediency become unexceptional once the state of war is made permanent, and the threats of enemies within erase the border between foreign and domestic.

    The expansion of these powers of threat and control across the spectrum of American life is a fundamental challenge to Constitutional governance, a challenge to every legal and moral standard we live by. It’s a challenge to our liberties, not just those of our demonized foreign victims. It builds a new structure of governance, new norms of behavior, that gradually replace the foundations of the old republic.

    The institutionalization of torture is bad enough. The underlying reason for it is simply ghastly, and of enormous import to every American. While we’ve lived in the fog of our carefully crafted self-image, many non-Americans have seen these trends all too clearly, and have rightly feared Washington’s power and hegemony. Now, it is time for we Americans to be afraid. Very afraid.

Most Active Letters Threads

550

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
543

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
435

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
202

Bigotry wins in Switzerland

By voting to ban the construction of minarets, Switzerland apes the most extreme intolerance in the Muslim world
146

Mike Huckabee's fatally bad judgment

Brutality by another Huck-pardoned criminal suggests the 2012 GOP hopeful listened more to pastors than prosecutors

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon