Are they natural opposites?

Clinton supporters tell us that they support her because of her positions. Her positions are exactly the same as Obama's. In the most case, you cannot get a playing card between the two.

Clinton supporters tell us that they support her because of her experience, but they wish to cherry-pick the experience. They give her a pass on her failure with health care, even though she has now come up with EXACTLY the same plan again - how is that experience?

The Clinton supporters tell us that they are rational, yet they are screaming in anquish about "our girl" and "she's so brave" and "I love hillary so much" - all quotes btw. This is a classic case of a cult of personality.

I just hope that the Clinton supporters sober up before they do something that they will regret the rest of their lives.

Speak to a Nader supporter. They voted for him because it was the right thing to do. That brought us George W. Bush.

McCain is the same as Bush. There is NO DIFFERENCE between them, except one is stupid and the other old and crotchety.

Remember the good old days of the Nader voter...

"A vote for Nader is a vote for Nader."

"if Al Gore was a good politician, I would vote for him. I'm voting my principles, not for the Democrat".

"Al is going to win, so it doesn't matter if I vote for Nader"

Here's the best one of all:

"How bad could George Bush be? I kind of like the guy..."

So, Clinton fans, you be the judge:

8 more years of Bush/McCain, or moral government? It may be up to you.

Remember the good old days of the Nader voter...

"A vote for Nader is a vote for Nader."

"if Al Gore was a good politician, I would vote for him. I'm voting my principles, not for the Democrat".

"Al is going to win, so it doesn't matter if I vote for Nader"

Here's the best one of all:

"How bad could George Bush be? I kind of like the guy..."

Clinton fanatics are getting ready to repeat Nader, 2000, except even worse. So, Clinton fans, you be the judge:

8 more years of Bush/McCain, or a moral government run by Democrats? It may be up to you.

Remember the good old days of the Nader voter...

"A vote for Nader is a vote for Nader."

"if Al Gore was a good politician, I would vote for him. I'm voting my principles, not for the Democrat".

"Al is going to win, so it doesn't matter if I vote for Nader"

Here's the best one of all:

"How bad could George Bush be? I kind of like the guy..."

Clinton fanatics appear to be ready to repeat the terrible error of the Nader voter in 2000, except even worse. So, Clinton fans, you be the judge:

8 more years of Bush/McCain, or a moral government run by Democrats? It may be up to you.

"It's not just "older white women" against Obama, it is Hispanics and Asian-Americans too"

"The only racial minority vote that Obama got by a landslide in the primaries was the black vote. He didn't get the other minorities' votes."

Whoops, chucklehead - you have not been keeping up. Obama leads with hispanics 65-25.

Try to stay awake, doctor. Doctors are supposed to be the good thinkers, not the ignorami.

Yeah, that's you, doc.

Here's an NBC/WSJ poll reported recently.

WASHINGTON - Days after becoming his party’s presumptive nominee and receiving an endorsement from his chief rival, Hillary Clinton, Democrat Barack Obama has opened the general election campaign with a six-point edge over Republican John McCain, according to the latest NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll.

Obama leads McCain among registered voters, 47 to 41 percent, which is outside the poll’s margin of error. In the previous NBC/Journal survey, released in late April, Obama was ahead by three points, 46-43 percent.

Obama’s strengths and weaknesses

In the head-to-head matchup, Obama leads McCain among African Americans (83-7 percent), Hispanics (62-28), women (52-33), Catholics (47-40), independents (41-36) and even blue-collar workers (47-42). Obama is also ahead among those who said they voted for Clinton in the Democratic primaries (61-19).

HISPANICS 62-28, DUMBSHIT.

Look, jackass, don't call my hand unless you know what you are doing. Being a dumbshit is no way to go through life.

thefakedoctor, who is really thebiggestmoronontheboard, believes a 7 month old poll involving people not currently in the race over a current poll run by very reputed pollsters.

you are a fool buddy, and when you are a fool, you never admit you are wrong.

not only are you wrong, but you are stupid.

So, no need to reply. I will not reply to you, because you are a jackass who cannot be reasoned with. You must be about 16. Because you remind me of my teenage son. Stubborn and ill-behaved, plus stupid.

"Tell me convincingly what he is actually for and what he will actually do if elected then I can consider voting for him."

Woo-wie kazowie I can answer that:

http://www.barackobama.com/pdf/ObamaBlueprintForChange.pdf

"Look, in medicine, there is a culture of "evidence-based medicine"- which means, if you are going to make a claim about patient care, you need to back it up with a reference to a source of information that is legitimate."

You're not a doctor, clown. You are a moron.

I provided a citation to a MSN/WSJ poll. You are simply too stupid to realize that you are wrong, that I have you, that I kicked your stupid ignorant butt, and took all your chips.

I am in the medical research field. I can SMELL the clown poseurs, and you're a poseur, jackass.