"Is she breaking a rule by not releasing them? Just because her opponent asks her to doesn't mean that she has to, or is playing dirty by not agreeing. She said she'll release them when she's the nominee."

Well, she's filthy dirty. She and Bill have been getting millions and millions of dirty dollars from all sorts of scummy places. If she was clean, she'd release them.

Maybe she lost them? If she could just find those lost Rose Law Firm billing records, she might find those pesky tax returns.

She's got a long long history of scummy deals, and this is just another one. I, as a democrat, get FU.CK.ING tired of having, for years and years and years and years, having to make excuses for this ethically corrupt politician. When will she stop making crappy excuses and release the tax records?

If we are going to elect this scummy person, we need to know what's buried in those tax returns.

"Could someone please provide some piece of objective evidence to suggest that she is running a dirty campaign."

Yep, got that answer.

WHERE ARE HER TAX RETURNS?

That's evidence of a dirty campaign right there. WHAT KIND OF DIRT IS SHE HIDING?

Just what is she hiding there?

She sure has a lot of money. Who has paid off Bill?

Where did the money come from?

How much money is from Tony Rezko there?

How much from Norm Chu?

Who have the Clintons taken money from?

What do they owe them?

What's Hillary hiding?

WHAT'S HILLARY HIDING?

WHAT'S HILLARY HIDING?

WHAT'S HILLARY HIDING?

"Obamabots are open-minded, why do they hate Hillary?"

I'll trade you. I'll explain that if you'll explain why Hillary-bots are so clueless, so whiney, and so vindictively partisan.

Here's my deal: I have the explanation all written out. As soon as I see Hillary's tax returns, I'll send it right over to you.

"A poster from FL said the majority Republican legislature in FL pushed through the primary. Other legislation considered vital was in the bills, so the dems they felt they couldn't vote against it. He also provided a link to a dem FAQ on the vote to support his assertions. Unfortunately, a linkedto site (www.fladems.com) contains numerous articles from the Florida democratic party from the time period that undermine the portrayal of the florida dem party as innocent bystanders. They were all for thumbing their nose at the DNC and refusing to kow-tow. The convential wisdom at the time was that it would all be over in early February. Check out their articles from Q3 2007."

The FL Dem Party is using the Repukeliscum as cover. The Dem Leader introduced the Bill. There are plenty of Dems who voted for this violation of the rules. I have little sympathy for them.

Lohan's version.

Republican voters spoofing our democratic election. The large turnaround in TX is due to Republican rat-fucking our primary election. That's the whole reason she did well yesterday, so I see no reason to cut her any slack.

"It makes more sense to come to some sort of sane tallying - even if only partial. Thus, you have inflicted a puinshment, but avoided a total, one-off punishment that will have likely nasty consequences down the road."

I agree with that. We need to accomodate. FL and MI need to be seated.

Neither Hillary nor Barack can gain from this process.

I suggest that we do either 1) Split the seats down the middle or 2) Give each campaign seats proportional to their totals after PA.

"ut it was brought up on this morning's today show that the primaries were moved by the GOP in each State, "

Well, the record will show that the Democratic Party does not control the legislature in FL. The record will also show that the Democratic Party voted for this, and that the bill to move the primary in FL was introduced by a Democrat. So, they are not without problems here.

incredibly worrisome.

Who knows what scummy toads have bought and paid for HillBill? What are they hiding? What scummy deals are they concealing? Why won't she release her tax returns?

When you lose a state in a primary, that has NOTHING to do with your success in the general. In fact, if you wish to go that route, Obama will win the entire south and the entire west, except CA. Of course, these notions are advanced by Clintonistas, who don't seem to understand the difference.

The Dem nominee is going to win CA, OR, WA, NY, NJ, IL, DE, ME, VT, MA, PA, and a number of other traditional blue states. This is not a debateable point. What more will the nominee win? That's the question.

Hillary backers, lying at the speed of light, wish to contend that a loss in the primary = a loss in the general. That's stupid, to put it in a clear light.

"Obama taking his name off the ballot was a political ploy to try to get "uncommitted" to defeat Clinton. He overestimated his support and it backfired. He ought to have to live with that."

Well, that's just moronically idiotic. He was actually cooperating with the rules. Hillary was cheating. When you cheat, you should not get ahead.

Hillary loves to cheat, and has done a lot of that in this campaign. Will she try even harder to cheat her way to the nomination? Or will she play by the rules, and work for a re-vote or a caucus in both states?

Hillary kept her name on the MI ballot to cheat her way to more delegates. There is no other interpretation. Her campaign has had so many of the cheating moments that we forget how scummy so many of the actions are.

No rewards for cheaters. MI represented cheating.

FL as well involved cheating. She violated the rules by campaigning there.

No victories for cheaters.