Letters to the Editor
dataguyx
Published Letters: 790 Editor's Choice: 10
-
You must be insane
[Read the article: Will Obama's debate stumble hurt him?]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]"I fear this will be a very bitter election if it is McCain vs. Obama - you couldn't have two more polarized sides. There will be much bitterness, clinging, opposing-side hatred, accusations, and vitriol."
There would be no more bitter and divisive election than anything involving Shrillary and Bill the Fuck. These are the most divisive politicians I have ever seen. They care nothing about principles, caring only for principals - themselves. Their lack of standards and focus on winning at all costs will make for a totally polarizing election. That's why Shrillary cannot be the Democratic candidate.
Shrillary has an ABSOLUTE MAX of 51 % of the electorate. Plus, there are thousands and thousands of persons who will be less motivated by this twit of a woman. And her ability to attract non-partisans is miniscule if not absent.
There is a reason that more and more border state politicians, like Claire McCaskill, the Gov of Kansas, every politician in Colorado, Montana, Iowa, Nebraska, New Mexico, and Nevada are backing Barack. They see a winner, who can motivate the swing voter.
-
@fishsandwich
[Read the article: Will Obama's debate stumble hurt him?]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]I am interested in your experience, and would like you to address the Ayers thing.
Let's say that you were in Barack's shoes, and in the "bare it all" session. Would the Ayers thing come up? I believe that Barack went once to the house of Ayers for a party. How is this an issue?
I agree, bare it all. However, in so many of these cases, this crap is being made up as they go along. Ayers was 40 years ago a subversive. Today, he's an English professor, and very respectable. He paid his debt.
So, the problem is that, increasingly, it's wack-a-mole, and the mole, once wacked, just pops up again.
-
@biggerlies
[Read the article: Will Obama's debate stumble hurt him?]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]"They frame her with negativity and blame.
They say all these horrible things about her."
No one forced her to say that John McCain was ready for the presidency, and that Barack was not. This was her choice. She was the one who made herself into a bitch saying this stuff.
Time after time, she does it to herself, and her moronic clownlike followers blame Barack.
Why is that?
-
Obama's record
[Read the article: Will Obama's debate stumble hurt him?]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Once there was a politician. He was a good lawyer, but had little experience. He served in the Illinois state congress for 3 terms, and was a representative for 2 terms in Washington. Then he ran for President, and won.
His name was Abraham Lincoln.
He had less experience than does Barack Obama.
I think Lincoln did well, and Barack will do well also.
-
The will of the people vs the whining of the Klintoon KultWacks
[Read the article: Will Obama's debate stumble hurt him?]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]"History will not look favorably on Democrats who have blamed the first serious African American contender for president for the things that his opponents have said about him that involve race."
History will also frown upon the Democratic Party flauting the will of the people, expressed in dozens of primaries and caucuses, in which Barack Obama has proven that he is the choice of Democratic voters.
Say whatever you want, and whine as you will, but that's the reason for primaries: Find out what the people want, and run that candidate.
That man is Barack Obama.
-
@deepertruth
[Read the article: Will Obama's debate stumble hurt him?]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Why are you dodging the question of Shrillary's treason?
Shrillary said that John McCain was ready for the presidency, but that Barack is not.
This is treason.
This was her choice to make that statement.
Why did she do it?
-
Ignorant Irish
[Read the article: Will Obama's debate stumble hurt him?]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]The Amazing ignorance of maureenodonell is demonstrated simply:
Gerry Adams is a currently respected member of pariament in Ireland. In 1960:
"Following the failure of the talks he played a central role in planning the bomb blitz on Belfast known as Bloody Friday.[6] He was re-arrested in July 1973 and interned at Long Kesh internment camp. After taking part in an IRA-organised escape attempt he was sentenced to a period of imprisonment."
This is his past. In the present, he is a statesman. That's true throughout the world.
mr. Obama had MODEST and TANGENTIAL contact with someone who 40 years ago did stuff that he paid his dues about. Today, the guy is an English professor.
In our society, you pay your dues, and then you go on. Ayers paid his dues. it is beyond disgusting that Hillary harps in her bitchy way about this. It pisses off Democrats.
She will NEVER be president.
-
Hillary's experience
[Read the article: Will Obama's debate stumble hurt him?]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]is long in her own mind.
it's clear that she can serve tea like the best of them.
But that is not experience. She has little experience, less than Barack, at actually doing things on her own. Barack is a self-made person.
Hillary is Bill's second dick.
-
Clinton's act is old and tired
[Read the article: Bill Clinton's Golden Oldies act]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]and I am totally uninterested in hearing how great he is and what he did for America.
What he did is cram NAFTA down our throats. He destroyed the Democratic brand with triangulation. His inability to keep his zipper zipped was a mistake that Democrats still pay for.
I defended this piece of shit for years against republicans and other democrats who could not stand his moral depravity. Now I understand their ire.
Go away, Billary, and don't let the door hit you on the butt on the way out.
-
Who cares?
[Read the article: Campaign roundup]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]"Obama lost New York big, California big, New Jersey big, Texas, Ohio big, he's getting ready to lose Pennsylvania, and Florida and Michigan didn't count..........What a breath-taking victory"
CA will go dem regardless. NY will go dem regardless. NJ will go dem regardless. MI will go dem regardless. PA will go dem regardless. FL will go dem regardless.
All of these states are ALREADY in the bag.
So, what is the point of going with Hillary? She does no better than Obama, and in many cases she does worse.
Plus, if we go with Hillary, we lose CO, NM, NV, MT, UT, OR, and WA. We also lose IA.
Obama is a big big big net plus. Obama may put KS into play.