Letters posted here are associated with the following Salon Premium Member:

orbitboy

Published Letters: 1772
Editor's Choice: 100

Monday, July 23, 2007 12:24 PM

@Realname: Strawman indeed

The point is and I hope this doesn't zoom completely over your pointed little head, that simply not having done something does not automatically disqualify one from expressing an opinion or taking a position on something.

No one I know of argues that this is the case. It doesn't disqualify anyone from speaking on the subject at all.

What it DOES do is identify that person as a hypocrite. Being a hypocrite doesn't disqualify anyone from speaking on a topic, nor does it make him or her wrong about that topic. It just means he or she is a hypocrite. If a guy who smokes two packs a day scolds other people for smoking because it's bad for them, it doesn't make him wrong, just a hypocrite.

And if someone wants to disqualify the opinion of a hypocrite, that's up to each individual. But it's not up to YOU to assume WE have ALL done so.

Is that clear enough?

Monday, July 23, 2007 02:06 PM

Logical gymnastics, semantic games

and blaming Clinton. It's all they have left. Well, out and out lies. They've always had that...

Monday, July 23, 2007 02:59 PM

@Denning

I genuinely thought your post was funny. Only thing is, there aren't many Democrats with any sort of power who are advocating an immediate pullout. Not Harry Reid, not Hillary, not Obama, etc.

But your post WAS funny nevertheless. Maybe you should have substitued "leftists" for "Democrats"? But that's part of the problem. It's hard to define those of us who aren't Republican and fit us into a neat group that makes for pithy, clever jokes.

Tuesday, July 24, 2007 07:44 AM

Double standard

I LOVE how supporters of this administration thinks it's fine to be as vocal as they please in support of the Iraq occupation, but the minute somebody offers any sort of criticism, all of sudden we have entered the realm of "partisan bickering."

Support = "balance";

Dissent = "unfair partisan gamesmanship."

Tuesday, July 24, 2007 01:38 PM
Original article: John Yoo -- then and now

WT and beebop: Football stories

In a 9th grade JV football game, I was returning a kick-off and put a Vince Young-like fake on a would-be tackler that was so awesome, that he actually fell down without touching me. Problem was, the same guy got back up and caught me and tackled me anyway. That was my last season in football! I've been a distance runner ever since.

Tuesday, July 24, 2007 01:59 PM
Original article: John Yoo -- then and now

bebop-o:

Now you're creeping me out: it's gonna rain here cats and dogs in about 5 minutes. (check the radar for Austin, Texas if you don't believe me.) Man, this is weird...

Tuesday, July 24, 2007 02:34 PM

@L.W.M.

You mean something like, "Overthrow Saddam now, or forever hold your peace"?

Wednesday, July 25, 2007 11:02 AM

Instructions to potential whistlblowers..

You know how to whistle, don't you, Steve? You just put your lips together and... blow.

--To Have and Have Not, 1944

@Robert Bohdan

I think we know how jurors will feel about the veracity of the testimony from whistleblowers who have been paid millions for their "evidence." Nice thought, though.

Wednesday, July 25, 2007 12:22 PM

I'm confused

What would a Republican want with any type of government loan--federal, state or local? I mean, they're the last people to suck from the government teat, right? They should be HAPPY that the Bush Administration is denying those loans.

Wednesday, July 25, 2007 01:41 PM

@Winkandanod

Yeah, I thought that in the Republican world:

"Anyone stupid enough to live in an area vulnerable to hurricane disasters is too stupid to deserve government charity. Instead, they should turn to the church for handouts while they're standing around waiting for some generous soul to build a new house for them."

Why should anyone pity "those people," right?

Wednesday, July 25, 2007 02:54 PM

@Arne

It's already well-established that shooter is a liar. Why keep flogging a dead horse?

Thursday, July 26, 2007 09:21 AM

Has anyone commented yet...

on the irony of Mr. Hagee's views being aired on a program called, "Fresh Air"?

Thursday, July 26, 2007 10:09 AM
Original article: Gravel's complaint

I personally think...

it's a great idea for media outlets like the LA Times to do features on the bottom tier candidates as a way to spice up a boring campaign season, as opposed to crap like stories on $400 haircuts and who wearing the what sort of make-up.

Thursday, July 26, 2007 11:15 AM

Re: Karl "Goebbels" Rove

He's always seemed more like Goering to me, but I'm splitting hairs, aren't I?

Thursday, July 26, 2007 11:55 AM

@RedPen

Yeah, that quote is what I was talking about, alright. Man, that could have come right out of Rove's mouth if I didn't know better.

Thursday, July 26, 2007 01:54 PM

Visions of John McEnroe

Thanks for posting the excerpt of Joe Klein's piece from this morning. In my mind Klein has hit a new low. While I was reading his infinitely lame excuse and rationalization, I kept hearing the famous voice of the young John McEnroe in my head, bellowing at the referees at Wimbledon...

"You CANNOT be SERIOUS!! You CANNOT be SERIOUS!!"
Thursday, July 26, 2007 02:18 PM

What good are all these hearings and testimonies

going to be if all the administration officials are going to do is stonewall and plead the 5th? Sound bites for Democratic campaign ads next year. If nothing else. You Tube, baby. You Tube. An endless stream of Republicans stammering on camera again and again will resonate with voters eventually.

Thursday, July 26, 2007 04:43 PM
Original article: Who are you, Anonymous?

I fully support an end to Anonymous letters

It's hard to follow, for one thing, when there's more than one commenter using "Anonymous," sometimes with competing opinions. Secondly, it would further reduce cowardly personal attacks, for sure. I also like the idea of letter writers having to "own" their past letters/opinions and have to answer for them when necessary, in cases where folks choose to dig back in a letter-writer's history for inconsistencies or evidence.

Occasionally there are topics which warrant the use of anonymous letters. In those cases, there could be instructions for the potential letter writer to email the letter to a set "editor" email address, and the editor could post it for the letter writer without attribution.

Friday, July 27, 2007 08:32 AM

@Iokannan in the Well

It's not just shooter's need to be the center of all things. There's also his pathological need to be persecuted for his beliefs. Why else would he come here day after day, knowing full well he doesn't have the goods to convince anyone here that what he types on his keyboard has any validity at all. He blathers nonsense and untruths so he can kick up dust, grab some desperately needed attention, and feels righteously persecuted for steadfastly supporting his King George. The worse things get for George, the more persucuted he feels. It's actually getting better for him with each passing year, and each percentage drop in the polls.

Most Active Letters Threads

543

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
537

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
435

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
202

Bigotry wins in Switzerland

By voting to ban the construction of minarets, Switzerland apes the most extreme intolerance in the Muslim world
146

Mike Huckabee's fatally bad judgment

Brutality by another Huck-pardoned criminal suggests the 2012 GOP hopeful listened more to pastors than prosecutors

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon