It's the Obama crowd relisting all of the past vetting of Hillary. Then Hillary gets out the kitchen sink and the wimps panic.......MY GOD SHE'S DESTROYING THE PARTY.

That's just the way it is. Despite hope. You need to man up. You don't cry. You fight.

Is already vetted. Has been for years...........I like that word--vetted. It's the foundation of our politics, like it or not.

For fear mongering in Texas......It's the land of Dubya. You do what you have to do.

Is just tossing a bunch of hooey around and seeing what sticks.

If it eventually comes down to only two human beings left and all they have is hope, well, that's better than nothing or negative.

But hope has restrictions. And hoping that vetting will cease is a blood relative to hoping that war will cease.

Even if Obama wins the presidency that is not hope winning out over vetting. It will get worse after he wins.

In love and vetting.

I do not priase the dark underbelly of vetting.........I'm just saying I prefer a candidate who is a veteran at receiving and administering it. That is experience.

In general terms that the real estate industry is very suspicious. Damn near every deal in one way or another.

Don't hold your breath on that one.......Now the line is Hillary is destroying the party. Chicken little stuff. The Obama camp is so confident and inspiring that they are already setting her up as the scapegoat for their defeat.

About how the supporters of each side look at it.........It doesn't matter if the vetting is true or not. If it's about my candidate it's not true.

Would be politically derelict of duty to not say "Rezko" every now and then. Don't need specifics or falsehoods.

Christopher. Bush sent the soldiers to Iraq, not Hillary.

The one cry WAS fighting.

About 1/2 hour after the assassination (before the name Oswald has even surfaced) a few miles from the assassination site, we have a one cop slowly driving along a residential area. He pulls up to a guy walking along, and that turns out to be the assassin.

He shot the cop.

Is how many A-Rod hit pre performance enhancers and post performance enhancers. That we'll never know.

Obama isn't.

If Hillary ends up winning New York, California, New Jersey, Ohio, Texas and goes in to the convention with substantial wins in Pennsylvania and revotes in Florida and Michigan, and has the lead in the total popular vote and no one has 2,025 delegates the super-delegates will put her over, as it should be.

That he won a bunch of caucuses 5 months ago--will not be very convincing.

If Obama wins the nomination and loses the general it's not Hillary's fault. It says something about them that they are already lining up their excuse.

Are still stumbling around woozy from the kitchen sink coming down on their heads.

You're in fantasyland. If Clinton can get substantial wins in Pennsylvania along with the same in redos in Florida and Michigan and she takes the lead in the overall popular vote, you better tighten up your diaper.

Can get a substantial win In Pennsylvania, and the same in redos in Florida and Michigan, and can take the lead in the overall popular vote, I absolutely refuse to help change Obamabot diapers.

Is starting to doubt. Obama couldn't close the sale in New Hampshire. He couldn't close the sale late Super Tuesday in California, and he couldn't close the sale in Texas and Ohio. Now late deciding voters are going to Hillary.

This guy would be a disaster in the general.

Has not been arguing that the super delegates base their decision on their state results........Therefore if Hillary takes the popular vote lead, supers should go to her and the will of the people.

You mean like Florida and Michigan redos?

You have to appreciate the sheer drive and adaptation.........She's gonna kitchen sink the dude for 3 or 4 months then have Michigan and Florida redos.

Yes, I really want a revote in Michigan.

To support and vote for Obama in the general. But his campaign has some tests to pass. If we get opposition to new Florida and Michigan primaries, or insisting that they be caususes. Or if Hillary was to take a popular vote lead, and we get a new definition of what supers have to do, it's gonna be pretty damn lame.

Is to be vetted by Glenn.

For some wimp to say she's destroying the party.

There are subliminal shots of fried chicken and watermelon.

Are people with inferior militaries........And if they fight dirty to compensate they are terrorists.

He already destroyed the party. If McCain loses it was because of Paul.

The republican party cornerstone plank on limited federal government pertains to when republicans are not in power.

If it was Hillary, but it'd be at least 150.

They think they own it, so even when they don't, when they get it back they inherit all powers accumulated whenever.

They preach limited governmental power (and spending) with a straight face........I keep waiting for one of them to say that it's the states that should be spying on us.

Is spinning in his grave. He'd be having a blast these days.

How much bin Laden has changed things. I wrote a letter to the Syrian embassy about 20 years ago. I wonder if I made some list.

I'm not sure there would be much difference on how any President would respond to something like 9-11. In response the sacred mission would be to "protect the people" and play the patriotism card---and that, day in day out, would lead to abuse and over-reach.

On the night of 9-11 is --We have to guard against, in every respect, over-reacting to this......But they just can't say that.

The one who, the other day, responded to the 3-AM phone call add by saying neither one of them is ready.