Letters to the Editor
brightstar65
Published Letters: 3526 Editor's Choice: 16
-
LOL
[Read the article: Should I stay in my marriage?]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]brightstar65 may hold women to the same standard as
men, but I don't. I hold them to much lower one as it makes it much easier not to be disappointed.
LOL! I think evey guy should forumlate his own standards and expectations- Death by a Thousand Opinions. I personally do consider it OK to hold women to a higher standard than they are capable of achieving.
True, the constant disappointment women generate can be disastrous to one's hope of how people SHOULD be in a society where everyone is held to responsibilities and given freedoms fairly, and I have to live with that everyday. But to lower standards for women then continue to listen to women rattle on and on their typical bullpudding about 'equality' is one circle I cannot and refuse to square.
-
When are the pigs flying?
[Read the article: Democrats bear responsibility for restoring habeas corpus]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]While Bush & Cabal may indeed be the final death blow to a free USA, Clinton was not much better at holding off the international money men from rolling up the carpets in this once great country.
Dems and Reps are two sides of the same internationalist coin that has already decided the American experiment is over. They are now just threading their way through the most efficient way to get rid of the evidence.
-
Laughably sad world this Salon
[Read the article: A cause they've long ago forgotten]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]when a virulent useless troglodytic teletubby from hell like Rosie O'D is lionized while an uber-successful world traveling super wealthy self-promoting wunderkind like the Donald is despised.
But then, I never considered most lib women who read Salon to be fair or decent or rational, particularly when you take into account their unchecked (and self denying) hatred towards men, ANY men, in favor of women, ANY women, no matter how heinous those women may be.
As someone else said, RO'D attacked first, lobbing a gratuitous personal attack on the Donald.
-
Sounds like a pathetic weasel
[Read the article: "You have more bread crumbs than I do"]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]just like seems to have infested the remainder of this fascistic government.
-
Chuckle
[Read the article: Should I stay in my marriage?]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Maybe you own a Thomas Kinkaid franchise
LOL! Then LOL again!!
-
I do not see the problem
[Read the article: Daddy's becoming a woman!]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]mommies all over America dump the genitally male fathers and substitute them with female equivalents (since being a daddy is apparently not related to gender according to these libbed women)
The only difference here is that the genetic dad is taking the initiative being hip and making himself into the female daddy.
But I can understand how feminists would be bothered with a guy having any authority over HIS body, because it might make the gender playing field even for a guy to assume he is equal to a woman in terms of his right to his body and what he can do with it (like a woman can).
-
This is a meeting of equals
[Read the article: The impertinent prince]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]the Queen meets King George, Royal DickTater of America.
-
Satanic Hand Gesture
[Read the article: The impertinent prince]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Is Dubya doing something with his left hand in that photo?
I totally missed the satanic illuminati hand gesture
-
Frankly
[Read the article: Why I won't stay silent anymore]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]I do not know why mothers are not allowed to kill their kids AFTER they are out of the womb. Since women rule over their bodies and the house is an extension of a person's body, it makes sense that moms should be allowed to kill everyone in the house that is an imposition on their personal freedom.
But men should not have this same right, because we all know men stink and have cooties and they should not have rights anyway over children, even if they are the father. They can pay lots of money to moms though, that is one right they have. Because we all know men always owe women sonething, even if they do not.
Oh, and the term 'murder' should only apply to men when men do it, because we all know women are divine goddesses. And who can ever accuse a GODDESS, I mean a Goddamn divine being (!!), of murder? That is to laugh.
-
Dad says to mom,
[Read the article: Why I won't stay silent anymore]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]"Can I help you crush my baby's skull?"
-
I, for one
[Read the article: Why I won't stay silent anymore]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]am glad feminists are digging their hole to China. More and more people are realizing feminism is ultimately about terminal female selfishness and narcissism over anything else. I think most people RIGHTLY have problems with someone being terminally irresponsible and selfish.
If feminists had half a brain, they would take the high ground and assert that abortion SHOULD be legal but that it should not be done after a certain point in time, say the halfway point, and that the father, since he is on the hook for payments, should have a say in the child's provenance.
So it is nice for me to see that most of society agrees with me and that feminism is proving itself to be as depraved and illogical and INHUMAN as I have always believed it to be.
-
This opens up lots of opportunity for men.
[Read the article: Does sex through fraud constitute rape?]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]but NOT in ways that women think.
If someone can be accused of getting sex through fraud, consider how many women wear padded bras and other means of obtaining attention and sex through fraud when they have piddly tits after all. I mean, the guy wanted to have sex with the girl with big tits, not the girl who is fraudulently masquerading as the girl with big tits.
Consider how many women ACT like they are easy lays and then they do not go all the way. It is called a tease and it is fraud.
Consider how many women act like they LOVE BJs, that they will gladly give a man regular blow jobs, but then they stop doing it AFTER they marry. It is called fraud by the example offered in this article.
Consider conversely how a woman will lead a guy on to buy her dinners, then she does not put out. This is a criminal offense and finally men may have some LEGAL traction to get back at women for this criminality.
If a guy can be cited as a criminal because a girl mistook him for someone else, then these examples are all suddenly punishable criminal offenses lawyers would salivate over.
"Goose, MEET GANDER".