What he's actually saying:

I actually support gay rights, I just don't consider them as good as "real" people" And by support, I mean I don't mind them as long as they stay out of sight. And by rights I mean as long as they know their place.

I would not consider nudists equal to non nudists either. There are more right and less right ways to live.

There is in your face nudism and discreet nudism.

I do not buy this lib thing that every lifestyle, no matter how extreme, is equivalent to every other (except of course white hetero lifestyles, which are to be considered eeeevil, per feminist doctrine).

But, I also do not like the idea of shutting down other people's lifestyles either.

So, there MUST be a decent compromise, musn't there?

but

First of all, there is no disgrace in being a lesbian.

Say a MINUTE percentage of humans, mostly lesbians.

At some colleges, in fact, there is disgrace in not being a lesbian.

10 or 20 institutions of higher learning out of 2900 maybe?

Second of all, what is this human rights violation?

The right to not have one's property devalued because shameful gay activists, who would turn society upside down to serve their agenda, use the term as a signifier of man-hatred.

[Just a caveat, I actually support gay rights. I do NOT support society considering gay and straight on equal footing though. Think of it this way, I like ditch diggers and heartily supporrt fair wages for ditch diggers, but they are NOT brain surgeons and should not get paid brain surgeon wages.]

Unlike men, who all want barefoot and pregnant madonna whores (according to feminists), every woman is a unique snowflake.

Thus, there is some woman that wants Hector, a bow-legged, drunken 60-something funeral parlor operator with a piss fetish and a bad case of rotting teeth.

The divorce mediator said I couldn't give a six year old girl shoulder rides.

I asked why.

She said, "Her vagina is too close to your neck!"

Tell me this is not really happening. If it is, I am completely throwing in the fucking towel on this society.

THANK YOU, FUCKING FEMINISM.

and digging yourself a deeper hole.

is operating one one synapse and two neurons.

I do not have to answer your stupid question. I described to you why your whole proposition was flawed.

Someone else rightly called you out that if I did not answer in 20 words or less, you would trash me without consideration to the fact that I consider your initial question to be preposterous in the first place. I am not interested in book definition theoreticals, nor in propaganda abotu feminism.

What interests me is the practical results of so much man hating in this society as expressed and encouraged by feminists.

And technically, I DID answer in twenty words or less in the initial 'idealized' description of feminism-- as if that fakey fakey definition has ANYTHING to do with reality.

But anyway, you play with less than a full deck and are playing mind games to boot, which makes you less than honorable or respectable. HAVE FUN BEING THE DISHRAG to your feminist girlfriends, you a quite ably playing to the role of the behind the skirt hiding lib weasel I had already chalked you up to be.

don't bother responding to me anymore. I am certain it will be invective filled irrelevant and illogical blabber with no value whatsoever except to further cement your reputation as a gullible idiot.

is one of the purest most field-proven distillations in terms of assessing what is topmost on a certain consumer group's mind.

Apparently, women are obsessed with partly exposed female body parts, whatever THAT means.

Women refuse to carry themselves in a way that elicits confidence that women are NOT stupid. They constantly contradict their own positions, weasel out of others, and express no interest in intllectual pursuits BEYOND counting grievnaces against men.

In the modern fascisto-feminist model, women are supposed to be granted the benefit of the doubt and treated with automatic respect and as if they are all smart. This is but one point at which the artifice edifice of PC feminism fails.

(For you ready to jump my throat, I am talking about the majority of women, but by no means ALL WOMEN. There is a good 10-15% of women who are both smart AND ambitious and who run with some internal consistency and logic)

I cant wait

Didn't check your reply to my silly question yet, but the suspense is killing me. Maybe next week, right after I finish counting the floor tiles.

BTW, what makes you think that I give a rat's ass what you, or anyone else, thinks of my pseudonym?

But then what would one expect from a man-hating SELF-HATING lib except disingenuousness?

I answered your silly question on the other board where you also posted this same question.

oh, and I offer my regrets for your unfortunate pseudonym. How is that name befitting of a male? Then again, knowing how you respond to my posts...