the very few bad men destroy the reputation of the whole sex.

So if we keep allowing women to define male sexuality, one cannot help but conclude we will all be painted with that broad brush.

That is the real danger. Men need to define what is right and wrong but also have the empathy for our weaker brethren to give them options to work out their needs that are legal and socially accepted.

otherwise we can sadly say women will continue to be able to make cases against all men for the behavior of the few.

you deserve better.

(at least this is the advice women always give each other)

I am not a virgin by any means, and sowed my oats in my younger days when I was clubbing and bartending, but I have become fascinated by how women will throw themselves at the "bad bays" who are going to hurt them in the end, even the women in their 30's and 40's. Divorced women may be the worst. They do it, they get hurt by a guy who was never going to establish a relationship, then they find a nice guy to tell the story to while looking for the next "bad boy." Not all women are like this, but many are.

Oh, so it is not just me who notices women are all full of shit.

To the woman writing that men fall over her on the way to the bleached blondes, it is not because you are unattractive but because you are the type that is standoffish and when you do get in a relationship with a decent guy, you make him wait months to get it on, unless of course you get lucky and find a bad boy, at which point you put out in a matter of one or two dates.

Oh, and I NEVER post anonymously. I am quite unashamed and proud of all my posts and regret not one word I write on these boards. EVER. That another former nice guy also living in Austin (I live in Houston now mostly, another freak show, but I digress) sees it the same way I do means what I said was true, the whole of the male population is beginning to see women, what they do and say, who they choose, and how they act towards men, as bullshit.

But hey, you women want to decide who to fuck without consequences? The whole male population will make you stick to your decisions by ALL being manipulative charming assholes to you just so they can get laid. It will be fucking HEELARIOUS when that comes around and you women piss and moan endlessly how there are no longer ANY nice guys around.

They lie without guilt. Nothing they say can be trusted. This goes for BOTH parties.

The border is WIDE OPEN, police are told to lay off the 40 million illegals already here (half of Mexico basically), but the police have no problem haranguing American citizens with ample and close attention to speeding violations.

We are by far the wealthiest country in the HISTORY of the planet, pay taxes up the kazoo, yet I roll over knee deep potholes on the way to work in Houston.

There are lots of massive problems in this society and they are metastasizing as people realize nobody is steering the ship and nobody gives a rat's ass who is in power.

Rove is guilty and also a symptom of rampant citizen negligence of their role in overseeing government.

that heaven is a single common place? True heaven would probably be all that fulfills your soul all the time. Meaning good misanthropes would get to be around people minimally and good social butterflys would get all the prime time social parties they want.

And there would be lots of mind shattering sex too (always MY best part about heaven) for those who want it.

Actually, a lot of people take Helen Fisher seriously! she is considered an expert in her field and is well respected among anthropologists.

If she is well respected it just shows what sort of idiots you people are who respect her.

Typical PhD-bootlicker Take on Life: "She spent more years in school than me and is female, so she MUST be a ganius who is always right."

Most of the conventional academic fields are little more than churns for getting free money from others to produce garbage that 'passes'.

Most actual achievements and groundbreaking discoveries in academic fields are made by amateurs, those outside the field, or by those straddling two fields who have been shunned by establishment academics.

Also, academia swims in government/intelligence community/corporate money. How objective can you be when someone OWNS you? It has been known for decades that the monied elites have been feeding the feminist 'beast' plenty of dollars in order to divide and control society that much easier. Their prime weapon of choice is to feed university blowhards who hew close to the feminist line.

Finally, most academics have little real world knowledge, preferring their cloistered hidden realms, which further feeds their ignorance and arrogance. Many, if not most, academics are leftists who disown those who rise above based on pure skill and talent and who do not play along with the 'party' line.

So basically, as I have said before, most of academia is groupthink daisy-chain bullshit.