traditionally marriage was about two people coming together in love before a deity to celebrate life, love, procreation of the next generation, social connections.

today, marriage is something a girl is SUPPOSED to have to fill a hole, and if she can't or won't go that way, then dammit, give her the coupon instead, because after all, it is all about HER, not about the aociety she lives in.

In the old days, they would kick her out of the tribe and set her free to go find witches to tell her how right she was and how wicked society was.

Frankly I prefer civilization and society, which is MUCH more than can be said about these hyper entitled self centered freaks.

NO WONDER I CAN'T STAND SO MANY AMERICAN WOMEN. One senses that this is not an idle thought in one girl's head but a fiduciary calculation many girls make.

Can you imagine a guy having the chutzpah to ask such a horrendous thing of their parents?

and the libs are lusting for this to happen.

Talk about the enemy being among us TRUE AMERICANS.

that treats them like crap.

where is the contradiction?

I know I shouldn't keep arguing with trolls but if I were to apply the logic that mothers don't want to work full time therefor women are lazy and don't deserve equal pay. I might also apply the logic the other way. Because 72% of fathers aren't willing to give up work inorder to be the primary care-giver to their children then they don't deserve equal treatment in custody battles. And before anybody starts getting really angry at me, I don't really believe either of those statements I'm just noting the obvious counter-point.

Ooh, JUICY!

1. You should not keep arguing with so called 'trolls' because god forbid you may actually have to defend the indefensible that feminism has become.

2. Believe me, most women apply the logic that since men work more often full time, they should not get custody. Of course it is easy for women to be able to push this line when most of the REFUSE to have their husband be a stay at home dad. In this way you can see another indication of how men are UNQUESTIONINGLY RAILROADED by women and society. THEN YOU WONDER WHY GUYS ARE FURIOUS?!?

one who understands what we guys are about.

and for the record, AS AN ENLIGHTENED GUY, the few times I have been propositioned by gay guys, particularly by attractive gay guys like the {supposed} ballet dancer for the Montreal Ballet once, I was quite flattered even though I have less than zero interest in doing something with a guy.

I then of course wonder why I live in a virtual DESERT in America where SINCERE flattery from a woman seems to be harder to pull than a brick from a sphincter.

Part of the feminist WAR AGAINST MEN I am sure.

women are negatively affected by male circumcision.

Because of the decrease in men's sensitivity, men have to plunge harder and faster to get any pleasure. Making sex not into a slow sensual lovemaking session but something closer to what you see in porn films.

There is evidence many men are premature ejaculators because the point of no return comes up on them quicker and less predictably than it would if they had intact organs.

I am sure the feeling inside a woman of the flesh moving past must be different, leading to more unpredictable movements, which heighten pleasure.

A smoother penis head occurs because the penis is bathed in fluid when a guy is intact. A rougher head feels different, less like velvet, more like sandpaper.

The REALLY REALLY SAD THING about this is that the onnly way we can get society to sto male genital mutilation is to appeal to WOMEN (!!!) rather than realizing that men are human too and thus deserve the rights women take for granted in this society. FUCKING SAD

of how trite and silly Broadsheet is.

this week in the love column is some silly graphic, and feminists make a big deal about their misinterpretation of it.

While last week's love column was far better, talking about a woman who finally ditched the Rules and found the perfect guy. But I never saw any mention of that article on Broadsheet though it is far more significant than a silly graphic.

My guess is last week's article was unflattering to the legions of feminists who adore keeping men guessing and on a string, making them do all the work and tweaking them for asking a girl out.

this week's article meanwhile, lets feminists drool over insignificant misinterpretations that can surely be blamed on the offending cartoonist, who is probably male. So this article is worth talking about.

huh

that if it was a 35 year old guy and a 17 year old girl, that he would be in jail?

women can do what they want, but let us men do it too.

is a different story than this, and if you do not understand the difference, you proved my point about American women.

Also, just because more foreigners suppsedly have trust funds does not mean American girls don't fantasize about this too.

Trolls like Dover, Brightstar, etc. have never let facts stand in the way of their anger and bitterness about this supposed double standard they see everywhere.

I could say the same statement above can apply to all feminists instead.

And you know, the majority of society would agree with me.

Scientific studies are proving everyday that where a feminist sees a bogeyman, it is likely she is, in her blind rage against men, misinterpreting some situation.

The difference between feminists and me is that noone is out to get women, but women are AVOWEDLY out to destroy men.