Are you saying that women in some way control the ability of men to click where they want to click? That's pretty nifty! I will try it now: magic vagina, please make Brightstar click on a link to a feminist diatribe!

Not quite. I AM saying within the major media, the book publishing companies, the advertisers, the emasculated New York punditry, that feminists and liberals largely control what is out there. And the prevailing sentiment is that feminist orthodoxy, as pig headed as it is, rules. This means, men should always be put down for having an opinion that challenges this orthodoxy, even if the men are correct, and that women and their opinion should be elevated no matter how piggish or selfish their behavior. It is the triumph of the squeaky wheel, feminists have bandied on about women being 'weak victims' for so long that all opposition to this false premise has been shut out.

So I understand women are ultimately incapable of generosity towards men, that they are terminally navel gazing narcissists. I understand this. THIS DOES NOT MAKE IT RIGHT.

This situation is of course exacerbated by the women themselves because no woman ever tolerates her guy ever saying ANYTHING but that which she WANTS TO HEAR, meaning guys are quickly trained to avoid saying anything against feminism for fear of having sex and affection witheld from them.

This is the greatest put down of men of all. Women treating men like DOGS or vermin rather than being fair to men, respecting their opinions, or accomodating men's needs. "So sorry that you have this issue with liking lots of sex, guys, but we women will use it against you anyway. baahahahahahahaaaa a a a !!!!"

Also, men cannot click to find books like this if they do not know the books exist. The major media is tilted against men and their needs. This is one reason I advocate men separating themselves from the man-hating media and finding their own channels to communicate AWAY from women and feminists. The internet is a boon to this movement.

Society despises the average man. Women will not give him any generosity, rich powerful men will not bother (they already have theirs, and plenty of it), men who are good 'players' get more and more access to ever greater amounts of free and easy uncommitted sex as the channels of communication and mutual respect further erode between men and women.

It is all pathetic and ultimately why I have given up on this culture altogether. If women want to continue to run an ultimately destructive zero sum man-hating game, go for it.

The Republican media's attempt to turn this creature into a sex symbol is a performance an order of magnitude more riveting than anything Thompson has ever delivered.

His wife's hot and quarter century younger than him, so he is a sex symbol to somebody.

That or she is milking him in typical female fashion.

Only losers engage in online dating, mostly women.

And they can thank feminism for their sorry plight. eHarmony is filled with these fools.

Feminism taught them that they TOO deserve a Brad Pitt/Tom Cruise/George Clooney, which leaves them open and more vulnerable than ever to attractive but predatory two bit players who take advantage of these women's greed and naivete.

Truth is women can be married and quite happy if they knew how. But they have been trained by feminists to avoid this happiness like the plague (all men are potential rapists who will abuse and enslave them). So instead, because they cannot match the unreasonable expectations placed on them or the expectations they place on the men around them, they get fat, and they get cats.

Darwinism at its best, weeding out the dumbkopfs.

is to deny them the right to state their true opinion to you. Since the man states his opinion anyway, another way of bashing him is to then use ad hominem attacks, to ignore him, to mock him, to belittle him, to gang up on him, to namecall him, anything but to tell him you are grateful for his opinion but you respectfully diagree and here is why...

that is just one way to bash men, but it is very prominent on these boards.