I read through some of your letters and you appear to have such anger toward women.

No, I just want women to stop being selfisah pigs and to begin acknowledging thsat they are at least half responsible for both the good and the bad things in America. If I seem angry, it is because women are such pigs in they continue to refuse to acknowledge this, which leads to frustration on my part. I am not the typical pushover boys you deal with, the ones who do as you say or else they won't get any from you, so get over it.

You have posted lots of accusations, anger, and generalizations about us.

and American women NEVER do this about men?

I hope you're just trolling because the energy put into hating ... it's not good for you and I mean that sincerely. I would say the same to a woman who posted venmous things about men too. You've only got so much time in life after all ...

And I have said I have given up on American women altogether, The gender politics is such that a man has to be an idiot to make ANY commitment to any woman since it comes back and bites him on the ass LEGALLY, the system is so stacked against men. Just say I wanted to do the one night stand thing instead, which I cannot comprehend and refuse to do, why would I want to be with a woman who has been with 200-500 other men? Also, most women seem to choose their men based on shallow considerations rather than on substantial character traits. I disrespect most women for this and refuse to allow myself to be used by women like this anymore, (you know the women guys, the ones who will incessantly complain about their douchebag bastard boyfriends to you while not leaving them for someone better-- like you for instance-- (as if I would want them anyway anymore)). Basically, I have chosen to be celibate since I am not super rich nor super hot looking and thus cannot snag decent TRUSTWORTHY women.

such as this Lloyd blog only prove just how desperate, shrill and dishonest feminists are becoming. This, despite most of American society, men and women, having been formerly sympathetic to the feminist cause- bending over backwards literally to give feminists equality.

Americans were never sympathetic to feminists, you say? Women control whether they breed or not, despite what the other half of the relationship says or wants (I thought it took two to breed). Women go to college more than men, choose any career they want, work or not work, bear kids or not, vote, have affairs, bank accounts, divorce for fun and profit, fix their own cars, lift weights and look like men, fight in wars or not, change genders, and do all the things men can do and MORE.

I thought this was all a sea change from what women were formerly allowed to do a century ago, or were feminists lying about that too?

As for this article being troll bait, since I am not a troll I cannot say. But I can say this article sincerely makes me question the whole premise of Broadsheet. If irresponsible crap like this can be published and hawked by mainstream pbulications like Salon, I am certain that men are not yet doing even half of what it takes to ratchet up the level of diatribes AGAINST this radically irresponsible new brand of feminism. I am up for the task and, believe me, I intend to begin cashing this puppy in. There is a BIG market, I suspect, in books that will tear apart and shred the lies of TROLL feminism.

Shame on feminism, Broadsheet, and Salon if this is the level of crap it has sunken to.

I came to understand that men need women, but women do not need men.

How is this equality of genders?

Please explain in detail, feminists.

Oh, you cannot. I see...

but you can spew the same bullcrap over and over and accuse honest AWARE men of [god, no] being scared of (weak, wittle old powerless, girly) women.

1. Men need sex and like sex.

2. Men cannot get sex as easily as women can (just by wagging your asses, for instance).

FEMINIST CONCLUSION: Therefore, men need to be punished for their natural desires and needs.

Say, it was the reverse and women needed something and could not get it as easily as men could.

You do know, the men would try to accommodate the women by setting up laws or some other means to give women something to satisfy their needs. This is evident evey day in the court system for instance.

Due to examples such as the one I just described, it is easy to see that men are much more sympathetic, compassionate, and fair to women than women can ever HOPE to be towards men.

This is yet ANOTHER way men are superior to women (as if it needs to be said).

Sorry Excuses for Humans (in other words: WEASELS) At The Top, Including Me by George Tenet

is for good men to do nothing. Or something like that, except that Tenet does not seem like a very good person.

No more Salon version of the gossips? Sorry to see it go, not that I read it anyway since gossip is everywhere else (there! I've agreed with your decision after all I suppose). We can still count on Paglia's Version of Celeb Gossip though.