Letters to the Editor
brightstar65
Published Letters: 3451 Editor's Choice: 16
-
What is the so called patriarchy?
[Read the article: Strong, silent, sick?]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]A few men are at the top running countries, corporations. They all have women around them who wield some power over them too. All these people are in the upper classes in terms of power, men AND women both.
The rest of us?
Well, the remaining women get together and make unreal demands on all men, those with power and those who are powerless. In marriage, all women WHO CHOOSE TO have always held the upper hand in terms of power, and this continues to this day, SUPPORTED by the pro-female-biased legal system.
The average man? He is out for himself, by himself, men by nature do not stand up for each other, preferring to jockey for niblets of salves where they can get them, where ever it may come from. This might change one day, when lots of men hurt very badly inside, above and beyond their threshold of 'being a man' and being tough, but this is doubtful. Men are always urged to ignore themselves and be tougher, wimps need not apply. Of course, women generally choose tougher men and avoid wimps, so soon the genome has many men with the 'tough it out' DNA, because after all, this is what women DEMAND of their men.
What I would like to see is a decentralized 'death by a thousand cuts' style of men's rights. Men need to teach each other the elements of power that women naturally wield and own, then the men need to take on and counter those elements of power in each of their own unique ways.
This is the only way I ever forsee men being whole, SATISFIED human beings, rather than fancified Ken dolls. Men who are FREE of the corrosive influence of the women in their lives, women who would gladly keep men in their narrow gender role of being the provider (even while he is being kicked in the crotch by her metaphorically when she is falsely telling him feminism is about women loving and REWARDING weak men too).
Women can live their whole lives as satisfied WHOLE human beings, even being able to reproduce without men.
Men NEED to match or exceed this capability to be whole humans too. No less is any good.
-
Like I believe any different
[Read the article: "Bitches-and-hos" lesbian subculture]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]the only solution is for straight girls to start dominating straight boys
Start? I mean, I'm no brightstar, but c'mon, most of my male friends are well and truly whipped.
I, Brightstar65, would not have said it any better. Girls run things. Guys pretend girls don't to save face. I merely call out the obvious, which is why it offends feminists and women, since it is a challenge to the overriding norm.
-
The Way of the Bastard RULES no matter what women say
[Read the article: "Bitches-and-hos" lesbian subculture]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Second, the nice guys aren't always so nice. Sometimes they're just needy and whiny and angry and passive-aggressive. I think eventually, the nice guys mostly just figure out how to be genuinely nice, and things pick up for them in terms of women. But especially when they're young, the "nice guys" I knew mostly had their own issues, stemming from childhoods and adolescents of getting picked on a great deal.
Nice guys are not so nice? WTF?!? And assholes ARE nice? So a woman would rather date a screwed up asshole as opposed to a screwed up nice guy? I couldn't make this twisted stuff up if I tried.
Point being, you women keep making those ludicrous excuses as to why so called nice guys are poison while dancing around the truth that women cling to evil men like gorilla glue to wood.
It is genetic, it is in your bones to find and cuddle to the worst bastards, because in the wild, the bastards survive.
So quit the crap about nice guys not being so nice.
That having been said, AGAIN, I could be Ktwdawg and his "Way of the Bastard" revelations- reading his post is basically my life too.
So why again do women prefer bastards over good men then LIE to themselves and to men about it?!?
-
Speaking of my previous post
[Read the article: "Bitches-and-hos" lesbian subculture]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]I will restate that the source of the world's problems hinges on who decides to breed the next generation or humans and what choices are made.
Since, unless a woman is raped and raises the baby, women invariably choose their mate whom they will bless with a kid, it invariably falls upon women as to who is generating the next generation of human beings.
WHICH IS WHY THE WORLD IS AS SCREWED UP AS IT IS.
You cannot hide behind the so called 'patriarchy' excuse anymore, women. You have been outed. You choose your mates based on your sexual preferences, which are to find the biggest troublemakers on the planet and bless them with offspring.
-
Sorry
[Read the article: Supreme Court upholds ban on "partial-birth" abortion]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]killing a child that could survive outside the womb is MURDER, plain and simple andn practitioners, the women and the doctors, ought to be in jail for murder.
Beyond this, abortion should remain legal for fetuses within the FIRST trimester or by the halfway point only, depending on what society finally decides.
Also, the fathers need to have equal rights to decide. Any less means men are worth less than women, which feminism always tries to uphold.
-
Just like it is unnatural
[Read the article: No more periods, period.]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]for men to bear children in a womb, it is unnatural for women to eliminate their periods.
-
Ban citizen arms and welcome a totalitarian police state into your house
[Read the article: Repeal the Second Amendment]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]If people on that campus were allowed to carry weapons, someone would have been able to take out that asshole and save lives of innocent kids.
You betcha, the US gummint is chomping at the bit hoping private arms are banned, so it is then very easy to abolish the rest of our dwindling rights.