Letters posted here are associated with the following Salon Premium Member:

ガガ ガガ ガガ

Published Letters: 152
Editor's Choice: 7

Monday, April 23, 2007 06:57 PM
Original article: Tough titties

The Patriarchy: Jessica is this a testable theory?

You blogroll "I blame the patriarchy" and indeed many of your posts do blame the patriarchy. Since you blogroll I blame the patriarchy (a pretty interesting and funny blog by the way) google is of little help telling us how many articles you have published that blame the patriarchy.

But is the patriarchy a testable theory?

I have never seen a single post anywhere that discusses what a world without the patriarchy looks like.

I can point to all sorts of blogs, short stories, movies, songs, articles, blooks, that discuss what a world looks like with racism, or without sexism,

But I've never seen a single anything that says what the world looks like without a patriarchy.

I am not saying the patriarchy is a good thing, or a bad thing, or something we need or don't need.

I am saying you folks have never defined it in a testable way. As something that can be measured. As something that we can determine has gone away, or been reduced, or been supplanted by... By what?

I have no idea what you feminists envision as the world without the patriarchy. What sort of culture or governance or economics or science or education or art or ... or we would have.

I just see posts that blame everything on men in general, and often on white men in particular.

Is "patriarchy theory" a useful theory for young women? Or is it a cult dead end? A scape goat? A whine? A power grab?

Monday, April 23, 2007 07:08 PM

Don't forget Broadsheet which speculated it was because "It was a lady murder"

Hey Joan,

Check out what your own magazine is claiming:

http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/2007/04/18/va_tech/index.html

"Would things -- would anything -- have been different if the first shooting had not initially been considered isolated as "domestic"?"

Monday, April 23, 2007 07:47 PM
Original article: Tough titties

Hey Symbol marktgarten!

All that being said, it isn't that the pay gap is entirely attributable to gender. "The evidence shows that even when the 'explanations' for the pay gap are included in a regression, they cannot fully explain the pay disparity," the report concludes. "The regressions for earnings one year after college indicate that when all variables are included, about one quarter of the pay gap is attributable to gender. That is, after controlling for all the factors known to affect earnings, college-educated women earn about 5 percent less than college-educated men earn."

That is, the gender based portion of the wage gap is five percent.

Monday, April 23, 2007 07:51 PM
Original article: Tough titties

Anyway symbol marktgarten, I am sure we both agree that

now that Jessica has seen the study that says teh gender based portion of the wage gap is only 5%, that she will never say it's 23% again at her blog.

Most Active Letters Threads

674

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
543

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
439

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
209

Bigotry wins in Switzerland

By voting to ban the construction of minarets, Switzerland apes the most extreme intolerance in the Muslim world
206

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon