- Top Features:
- War Room
- Glenn Greenwald
- Broadsheet
- Joan Walsh
- Camille Paglia
- Since You Asked
- Follow Salon:
Letters posted here are associated with the following Salon Premium Member:
Published Letters: 1
I am appalled that out of all of the letters only two point out that this insane woman is saying that breast implants are healthier than a naturally large behind! ARE YOU KIDDING ME??!
I don't understand how the editors of Salon allow this. Obviously Ms. Dickerson either did no research or if she did it is seriously flawed. How can putting plastic bags filled with salt water or silicone near your heart via incisions that could sever the sensation in your nipples forever be healthier than having a big butt, which by the way could be caused by having larger muscles in that particular body part. Does she think that because having large "fun bags" is much more widely accepted in white America than having a big butt it therefore makes it healthier? Never mind the fact that having a large middle section is what is indeed more dangerous as far as developing diseases such as high blood pressure, diabetes, heart disease etc, which many have pointed out Buffie does not have. This article was obviously a piece of crap unlike any I've seen here before in Salon (seems I missed her previous, equally crappy articles)and it worries me that the feelings it brings out are similar to those I feel when I see Anne Coulter.
Please Salon, take a higher road.
